top of page
  • Writer's pictureDeric Hollings

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT)

Updated: Feb 4


**Updated February 2, 2023

What is REBT?

I often find that when potential clients contact me regarding an initial screening for services, they communicate differing perspectives relating to how they conceptualize the field of mental, emotional, behavioral, and social health—collectively, mental health.

Who’s to say from where their perceptions stem?

Did they watch a movie or web series, listen to an audiobook or podcast, hear of experiences from friends or family members, have prior mental health treatment, hear about a popular trend on social media, or receive information from some other source?

The short answer: Maybe.

Due to the possibility of differing treatment expectations, I find it useful to discuss with prospective clients my approach to mental health treatment. I inform people that I practice Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), created by Albert Ellis.

With this psychotherapeutic modality, I listen closely for rigid and extreme narratives. These demands often manifest in the form of should, must, or ought statements.

“There are three musts that hold us back: I must do well. You must treat me well. And the world must be easy.” – Albert Ellis

Should-type narratives are often the elements with which we disturb ourselves. That’s correct; I said we tend to disturb ourselves. To demonstrate this occurrence, REBT uses the ABC Model which highlights the Epictetian notion, “It’s not what happens to you, but how you react to it that matters.”

People frequently maintain that an action (A) leads to a consequence (C). Someone blocking an aisle in the grocery store (A) is said to lead to anger (C). However, REBT maintains that rather than an A-C connection we disturb ourselves with beliefs (B)—B-C connection.

In this case, someone blocks an aisle with a grocery cart while paying no mind to you (A), you think, “This shouldn’t happen, and because it is, I’m being wronged [B],” and as a result of this unhelpful belief you disturb yourself to an angry disposition (C).

This is an A-B-C connection that could use disputation (D), leading to an effective (E) new belief (B).

Our self-disturbing must narratives, when left undisputed, may lead us to conclude that demanding words (i.e., I ought to have…, they better…, etc.) function as a prescription to life rather than a description of an observation.

Disputing (D) the rigid notion (B) that one ought not to inconvenience us could lead to a healthier outcome (E). It is worth noting that REBT as a system doesn’t claim to function as the be-all, end-all intervention for all diagnoses or situations.

In my sessions, I listen closely for expressed or implied demands, in the form of should-type narratives, as these terms often contribute to how people disturb themselves when requiring that the world conform to their expectations.

Though we tend to think our minds frequently use rational processes, this simply doesn’t seem to be the case. Rather, we often use illogical, irrational, and unhelpfully rigid and extreme demands.

Here’s an example of how illogical reasoning works:

· I should be perfect.

· I often make mistakes. How awful!

· This proves I’m imperfect and therefore worthless.

I assist clients by identifying rigid and extreme belief systems—similar to the example above—which often lead to emotional consequences (i.e., shame, guilt, sorrow, agitation, etc.) and behavioral reactions (e.g., punching a wall when upset).

Here are some examples of rigid beliefs:

· I must do well at work.

· Others must respect my views.

· Society must not cause me discomfort.

It isn’t uncommon to derive extreme beliefs from rigid expectations. Here are a few examples of these unhelpful combinations:

· I must do well at work, and it will be awful if I don’t.

· Others must respect my views, and it will devastate me if they don’t.

· Society must not cause me discomfort, and it’s terrible when I’m uncomfortable.

Using an REBT approach to psychotherapy addresses how beliefs and feelings interplay, and how they impact behavior. Stress or aggression management, relational functioning, and the processing of traumatic experiences are some examples of what this sort of therapy is designed to treat.

In my clinical practice, and with life coaching, I work with adult individuals. As well, it is worth noting that each REBT-trained clinician may practice this modality differently, as my style may not reflect that of other REBT practitioners or the Albert Ellis Institute as a whole.

In fact, much of the content I post within my blog may not be endorsed or even appreciated by the Albert Ellis Institute, as I speak solely for myself in this regard.

More about the REBT method

While REBT functions as a psychotherapeutic modality, it is influenced by the philosophical principles of Stoicism and existentialism. Noteworthy, Stoicism highlights courage, temperance, justice, and wisdom.

Examples of Stoic expression are statements such as:

· It is what is.

· Could be better, could be worse.

· That’s life.

· There’s no use in complaining, because it won’t change anything.

Sometimes, people mistakenly conflate existentialism with nihilism, relativism, fatalism, or absurdism. However, existentialism emphasizes action, freedom, and decision-making as being fundamental to human existence.

Examples of existentialist sentiment are expressions such as:

· Enjoy the journey if you can, because one day it will end.

· Nothing lasts forever.

· All things shall pass.

· There is no universal meaning of life, other than that which is self-ascribed.

Using a Stoic and existentialist lens affords one the opportunity to reduce suffering. As well, my approach to REBT incorporates elements of personal responsibility and accountability—collectively: Ownership.

Not quite the same as the concept of extreme ownership, because not all events that occur in our lifetimes are the fault of our own actions, ownership entails looking at what role we play and what outcome we prefer.

Perhaps thinking of this modality in a different way may help. As a child, I heard a saying that went something like, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.”

This was a Stoic approach to life. Somehow, through the passage of time and with changing attitudes, a number of people seem to have developed an alternative version to this dictum.

It’s now something like, “Sticks and stones may break my bones and words will also hurt me, because they’re terrible, horrible, awful micro-aggressions, and I couldn’t stand it if they were to be used against me.”

When I hear the term, “I can’t stand […],” I think of the REBT concept regarding low frustration tolerance (LFT). Is it true that one couldn’t tolerate being offended?

If people choose a victimhood narrative, opt to shift blame, and denounce ownership of their circumstances, it could be easy for them to delude themselves into thinking their problems are the responsibility of others to resolve.

This is becoming an alarmingly common societal narrative. For most instances, I reject this framing.

Keeping in mind the B-C connection, I assist clients in disputing narratives with which they disturb themselves. Remember, it’s not what happens to you, though your belief about it with which you disturb yourself.

This approach makes my clinical sessions more active than some clients say they previously envisioned. All the same, clients are encouraged to challenge their LFT, dispute irrational attitudes, and question learned helplessness—often taught by trendy social narratives.

“Too many people are unaware that it is not outer events or circumstances that will create happiness; rather, it is our perception of events and of ourselves that will create, or uncreate, positive emotions.”– Albert Ellis

REBT is a directive clinical approach, meaning I do not simply sit quietly in sessions and provide minimal encouragers (i.e., uh huh, um hmm, etc.). Nor do I exhaust a client’s time by taking 45 minutes to focus on breathing.

I don’t waste valuable time by divvying blame to past, present, or potential future actors who are believed to have somehow wronged my clients. As well, I do not encourage self-disturbing narratives by telling my clients they are deserving of or entitled to the treatment from others which they demand.

Rather, I use inference chains, empirical disputes, Socratic questioning, role reversal, role play, dialectic and didactic techniques, and other methods to dispute unhelpful and unhealthy beliefs.

For more information about my approach to REBT, I invite you to read my following blog posts:

· Desire and Disturbance

· Circle of Concern

· Mind Tricks

· Unconditional Acceptance

· Disturbing Democracy

· The Steel Man Technique

· Stoically Existential

· Iss-ME vs. Iss-YOU

Those blog entries will provide you with a general perception of my therapeutic style. Aside from how I conduct my sessions, I also negotiate homework so that clients may practice techniques they learn when working with me.

This can be a process that some clients report is uncomfortable. For those clients, I remind them that it isn’t the disputation that is discomforting; rather, it is likely that clients tell themselves they must not have their unhelpful beliefs challenged.

My approach to REBT also involves persuasive techniques so that clients develop a buy-in for their preferred outcomes. This affords people an opportunity to tailor sessions according to their unique circumstances.

Additionally, I use a hypothesis technique, by which I don’t claim to have all the answers, yet collaboratively the client and I work towards achieving a higher level of functioning and improved quality of life for each person with whom I work.

It is not my goal to simply help clients feel better, as the aim is to help people get better. The ultimate objective is helping my clients to become their own therapists.

Yes, this means I may work myself out of a job.

It is important to state that use of REBT does not promise to “fix” or “cure” people. Who said you’re broken to begin with?

I acknowledge that we are each fallible human beings, and I encourage clients to practice unconditional acceptance. Essentially, we can accept ourselves without using unhealthy conditions and without embracing unhelpful behaviors.

Is my approach to REBT practical for everyone?

As is the case with other therapeutic perspectives, REBT is not without its share of limitations and critiques. In its early development, REBT was said to be harsh, reductionist, formulaic, neglectful of deeper underlying issues, too rational, and without consideration of emotional impact.

For years, these claims have been disputed by REBT researchers and practitioners alike. I suppose it all depends on with whom you consult.

Personally, I’ve heard how others view this therapeutic intervention as understandable, though hard to employ, which serves as the most repetitive criticism I’ve encountered when using the modality. I do not promise ease to any of my clients.

I’ve also heard people state that REBT “makes sense rationally, though not emotionally,” “It’s impossible to rationalize yourself out of an emotive experience,” REBT could likely be interpreted as a form of victim-blaming, it takes more time to practice than other quick-solution models, and REBT allegedly minimizes past experiences.

Some of these accounts deserve assessment, depending on expectations for treatment, and I address them in session. I welcome questioning. Nonetheless, I’ll briefly address some criticisms.

Self-disturbance is what leads many of my clients to session. One may effectively use REBT to impact emotive and behavioral interplay, which could reduce disturbance.

Also, victim accounts may rely too heavily on ought-type narratives. Therefore, I do not join or ally with clients in a form of activism by which together we attempt to change the world.

Additionally, quicker isn’t synonymous with better. I maintain official training and certification in a separate clinical intervention strategy which is marketed as quick in nature, yet I no longer use the technique, because—in my personal opinion—it’s not well-suited for my psychotherapeutic style.

Lastly, while the past informs how we got the present, we live life moving forward from here. It’s impossible for me to erase a client’s past or control the future. As such, REBT uses tools to deal with what is, not what we think ought to be.

It is important to understand that Ellis once stated, “I hope I am also not a devout REBTer, since I do not think it is an unmitigated cure for everyone and do accept its distinct limitations.”

Personally, I remain skeptical of modalities which profess to do too much, cure mental illness, claim they apply to all conditions/diagnoses, or declare that one modality is akin to all the others. Per the Dodo bird verdict, not all psychotherapeutic modalities produce equal outcomes.

There are hundreds of different models available for mental health treatment. For more information regarding some of the most commonly used forms, you may want to check out GoodTherapy’s collection or Mental Health Match’s glossary.

For videos related to different psychotherapeutic approaches, you may want to consider Theories of Counseling’s YouTube channel. For REBT videos by the Albert Ellis Institute, I invite you to view content on REBT Education and Training’s YouTube channel.

As well, it may be worth noting that I am not the sort of therapist who focuses on “feeling your feelings” or “living your best life.” I don’t develop “personal truth,” overemphasize “lived experience,” or dwell solely on symptoms of mental illness rather than focusing on what may be done about them.

I’m not a clinician who disagrees with Hume’s Law, fosters self-deception and delusion, or one who focuses heavily on improving self-esteem. After all, the development of an overinflated sense of self-worth may not serve a client as well as one may hope.

Additionally, in my practice, I do not prefer to use race-baiting, agenda-driven, virtue signaling or moral grandstanding, hashtag movement promotion, or partisan sociological rhetoric. I work with clients on self-change, not activism geared towards changing the world.

I value the spheres of control, also termed spheres of influence, and I encourage clientele to consider—not necessarily adopt—that lasting change starts from within. As such, my clinical style may not be appreciated by those with social justice, radical feminist, intersectional, or socialist or communist-leaning social perspectives.

As well, I maintain no interest in advocacy for diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility rhetoric—considering that these missions tend to violate the very should narratives I challenge. For more information, I encourage you to read the following: REBT discourse.

“Even injustice has its good points. It gives me the challenge of being as happy as I can in an unfair world.” – Albert Ellis

Remarkably, I have dedicated considerable effort towards working with clients who have left the care of other practitioners, many of whom were said to have pushed values on people. It is not my responsibility to indoctrinate my clients or serve as a sociopolitical ally for them.

Additionally, I have had clients who’ve opted to forego REBT treatment with me, because I didn’t advocate for social change. After all, I am an REBT psychotherapist who maintains that it isn’t the occurrence of events—though people’s judgments of these matters—by which they disturb themselves.

Additionally, while I respect elements related to spiritual, metaphysical, and supernatural origin, I typically don’t incorporate these methods into my practice. Moreover, I do not focus on infantilization, paternalism, or victim-perpetuation.

Since much of what I do involves pragmatism, many of the aforementioned ethereal concepts may derail client treatment outcomes. Still, it isn’t uncommon for me to encounter prospective clients who are opposed to the concepts associated with my particular approach to REBT.

This is understandable and I don’t market myself as a one-stop shop for all prospective clients. I promote self-determination and autonomy, while also valuing the importance of social relationships, and I do not pretend as though my way is the way.

The psychotherapeutic intervention I offer involves challenging core and automatic beliefs, as a significant number of clients may experience discomfort with this practice. Therapy isn’t necessarily easy.

Some clients may also initially feel worse in the beginning of therapy than they did before coming to treatment. This is natural and is nothing to be afraid of.

My clients are encouraged to push through the discomfort in order to grow, as the benefit of REBT is allowing an individual to ultimately develop a proverbial toolbox that affords one the ability to function autonomously.

For those people who prefer an approach different to that described herein, I encourage you to consider other options. As well, for those interested in critiques of REBT, I invite you to review proposed limitations of this method.

ABC Model in practice

It may be useful to provide a specific example of how my approach to REBT is conducted. While the process listed herein is a somewhat oversimplified representation of how I conduct my sessions, it is my hope to leave the reader with some understanding as to what I mean when discussing self-disturbance.

The following example of the ABC Model is my main approach to psychotherapy.

A (Activating event) – You’re driving down the highway and another motorist suddenly cuts you off. You’re going with the flow of traffic, slightly faster than the posted speed limit, and it seems as though no other vehicles are treated similarly. This isn’t the first time something like this has happened to you either.

I find it useful to determine the critical (A); that is the content of the Activating event clients consider most relevant to the unhelpful Consequences they report. As previously mentioned, there is no A-C connection here, so let us explore the A-B-C connection together.

For the sake of this example, let’s say that when others cut you off on roadways (A) you notice that these events leave you feeling angry (C). Is the (A) responsible for the (C)? No.

B (Beliefs) – You tell yourself something along the lines of, “Others should not drive erratically,” “I must not be placed in danger,” or, “I ought to be safe when driving.” These must-type narratives may suffice for an administrative example.

Still, I’m not convinced that too many of the people with whom I work speak in such a reserved manner. In fact, I know my mental dialogue doesn’t communicate in this fashion.

In order to evoke an impactful Consequence, let us be honest with how we sometimes talk to ourselves. LFT is usually lurking somewhere within our self-disturbing Beliefs.

This may involve use of rigid and extreme demands of us, others, or the world in general. Also, it isn’t uncommon for obscene langue to be used in our mental discourse, so let’s really color the Beliefs properly.

You may tell yourself something like, “Who the fuck does this asshole think he is? I’m going 60 in a 55 and shouldn’t be cut off, because I could’ve died just now! That fucker almost caused me to wreck my car! I’m tired of this happening to me. You know what, I’m gonna’ catch that ass-munch and show him I’m not the one to fuck with! I’m gonna’ cut him off and see how he likes it!”

Not always is this monologue occurring in our minds, as many people yell these statements inside the vehicle. Who among us hasn’t?

C (Consequences) – With sufficiently punctuated Beliefs, you may experience a host of feelings. When I speak of feelings, I mean one of two things.

One, feelings as emotions (i.e., joy, fear, anger, sorrow, disgust, etc.). Two, feelings as bodily sensations (e.g., “I feel tightness in my chest.”).

Saying something like, “I feel like people don’t know how to drive,” isn’t necessarily accurate or helpful. Generally, if you can replace feel/feeling with thought/think, you’re likely not describing an emotion or body sensation (e.g., “I don’t think people know how to drive.”).

Saying something like I “shouldn’t be cut off, because I could’ve died just now [B],” when having been cut off on a roadway (A), I suspect you may feel scared, anxious, irritated, angry, or all of these emotions (C). You may also feel your heart pounding, legs going numb, head becoming hot, or shoulders tensing (C).

Also worth noting is that behavior, which some people refer to as actions, can serve as a Consequence. Let’s say fear (C) was the initial feeling you experienced, perhaps even without much forethought. After all, you were startled.

Following the Belief about how you “shouldn’t be cut off [B],” your secondary emotion manifested as anger (C). This is a self-disturbed Consequence fueled by a maladaptive Belief.

Perhaps that anger (C) is the most significant emotion you experienced. Your heartrate is accelerating to the point where your chest begins to hurt (C). You then step on the accelerator and weave in and out of traffic to catch the person who cut you off (C).

This actually happens, as some people ruminate over more self-disturbing cognitions (B) regarding how they’ll teach other motorists a lesson. It’s called road rage (C)—anger plus behavior—and it’s largely Consequence-based.

However, it isn’t that someone cut you off on a roadway (A) that led to you emotive, sensory, and behavioral experience (C). Remember your A-B-C’s.

Suddenly being startled (A) leads to telling yourself that your life is in danger due to someone having violated your ought-type Belief, and because of this unhelpful Belief you generate aggressive behavior (C) while disturbing yourself into a angry experience (C).

Goal – Once the A-B-C order of operations is established in session, I find if helpful to discuss what goals a client has regarding the presenting problem.

Let’s say that instead of feeling angry, enduring painful bodily sensations, and racing to do unto another motorist that which was done to you (C), you would rather be somewhat annoyed by the incident and not suffer other unhealthy Consequences.

It may be worth saying that it isn’t uncommon for some people to desire an unrealistic outcome, such as, “I want to feel totally blissful when someone cuts me off.” Let’s be honest, when have you ever experienced joy during such a situation?

While REBT is largely grounded in Stoicism, and to keep this example as straightforward and pragmatic as possible, I invite you to consider that mild annoyance may be preferable to disturbing yourself to aggression (C).

D (Disputation of beliefs) – Next, your Beliefs are challenged so that you may experience new Consequences, preferably those of a healthier or more helpful nature. While Disputing Beliefs may occupy more time in my sessions than any other element of the ABC Model, I won’t go too far into detail about the finer points of Disputation herein.

Still, I think it’s worth consideration of the following. I use inference chains, empirical disputes, the Socratic Method, role reversal, role play, and other techniques to assist clients with consideration of other perspectives and with challenging (D) rigidly held Beliefs.

For more information about how I use Disputation, I encourage you to select any blog entry under the Disputation category of my blog. There, you will find written dialogue related to how I Dispute irrational Beliefs.

Another significant element with which I assist clients relates to unconditional self-acceptance. As soon as we place rigid conditions on acceptance, we will disturb ourselves when we, others, or life violates our standards.

We accept ourselves as fallible human beings while challenging the many ways in which we disturb ourselves with maladaptive Beliefs. After all, we are not our thoughts or attitudes (B). These internal scripts can be invalidated.

As previously mentioned, REBT includes elements of existentialism. I discuss these matters with clients on a continual basis.

Suppose you understand that one day you will die, even if you practice safe and defensive driving skills. Maybe you even realize that with the limited time you have available, fulfilling purpose and meaning as an anecdote to suffering is worthwhile.

You no longer disturb yourself by pretending you’re the moral arbiter of the universe, educator on road safety, or enforcer of posted roadway laws. This knowledge could help frame your perspective (D) despite how others behave.

Suppose that after a back-and-forth dialectic (D), you arrive at a conclusion that better serves your goals and interests.

You determine that while it’s true some people violate driving laws, or even your personal rules for driving etiquette, a society in which liberty and freedom exist is to a degree inherently dangerous and likely always has been for as long as you can recall.

Considering these things, you further conclude that taking proper precautions (i.e., slowing down to avoid accidents, not pursuing other motorists, etc.) better suits your goal than self-disturbance. You no longer endorse the unreasonable conclusion that you must not die.

Sure, it may be mildly annoying to contemplate how others don’t share your sentiment, and you can accept this all the same.

E (Effective new belief) – You tell yourself, “Immortality isn’t something I’m guaranteed, I’m taking proper precautions for my safety, I can’t control the behavior of others, and I choose to lead a meaningful life despite the suffering I may experience [E].”

Because of this Effective new Belief, you are only somewhat annoyed when other motorists behave in a manner you wish they wouldn’t, having met your goal. Additionally, you no longer experience unhelpful or unhealthy feelings (C) concerning the roadway, especially because you choose to employ a more helpful Effective belief.

You completed the REBT formula:

Action + Belief = Consequence ÷ Disputation = Effective new belief



How empowering!

When working with clients using my approach to REBT, my ultimate role is to:

1. Identify maladaptive beliefs (e.g., rigid demands).

2. Actively and persuasively challenge these maladaptive beliefs.

3. Provide practice to clients with challenge to maladaptive beliefs.

4. Negotiate homework which affords clients an ability to identify, evaluate, and challenge maladaptive beliefs, and to rehearse rational alternatives.

“The best years of your life are the ones in which you decide your problems are your own. You do not blame them on your mother, the ecology, or the president. You realize that you control your own destiny.” – Albert Ellis

If you’re looking for a provider who works to help you understand how beliefs impact physical, mental, emotional, and behavioral elements of your life, I invite you to reach out today by using the contact widget on my website.

As a psychotherapist, I’m pleased to help people with an assortment of issues ranging from anger (hostility, rage, and aggression) to relational issues, adjustment matters, trauma experience, justice involvement, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety and depression, and other mood or personality-related matters.

At Hollings Therapy, LLC, serving all of Texas, I aim to treat clients with dignity and respect while offering a multi-lensed approach to the practice of psychotherapy and life coaching. My mission includes: Prioritizing the cognitive and emotive needs of clients, an overall reduction in client suffering, and supporting sustainable growth for the clients I serve. Rather than simply helping you to feel better, I want to help you get better!

Deric Hollings, LPC, LCSW


Aguilar, E. (2014, January 22). Spheres of control. EducationWeek. Retrieved from

Albert Ellis Institute, The. (n.d.). Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy. Retrieved from

Albert Ellis Institute, The. (n.d.). REBT research with Daniel David, Ph.D and Windy Dryden, Ph.D. Retrieved from

Albert Ellis Institute, The. (n.d.). The international home, headquarters, and heart of rational emotive behavior therapy and the center of excellence for training and treatment [Official website]. Retrieved from

Allen, J. (2017, September 26). 4 tips for living your best life – Inside and out. Collaborative CBT. Retrieved from

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Different approaches to psychotherapy. Retrieved from

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Emotional health. Retrieved from

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Role reversal. Retrieved from

Association for Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy. (n.d.). FAQs. Retrieved from

Australian Institute of Professional Counsellors. (2013, September 5). Role play: Cognitive behaviour therapy [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from

BBC Radio 4. (2014, November 18). The is / ought problem [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from

Berger, V. (2005). Rational emotive behavior therapy. Psychologist Anywhere Anytime. Retrieved from

Berry, W. (2012, May 6). The truth will not set you free. Psychology Today. Retrieved from

Bortolotti, L. & Mameli, M. (2012, May 31). Self-deception, delusion and the boundaries of folk psychology. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved from

Braman, L. (2019, December 1). Therapy is hard. Untold Media Inc. Retrieved from

Bristow, W. (2017, May 4). In therapy: Why you might feel worse before you feel better. Retrieved from

Budd, R. & Hughes, I. (2009, September 2). The Dodo bird verdict--controversial, inevitable and important: a commentary on 30 years of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. Retrieved from

Byrne, J. (2021, October 17). REBT: The limitations and errors in this system of counselling and psychotherapy. ABC Counselling and Psychotherapy, Hebden Bridge. Retrieved from

Carter, J. A. (n.d.). Relativism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from

CBTGuide4Students. (2016, March 21). Strengths and limitations of REBT. Retrieved from

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, June 28). About mental health. Retrieved from

Coleman, J. (2012, August 30). Take ownership of your actions by taking responsibility. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from

Collard, J. (2018, February 24). Rigidity versus flexibility: The key to mental health. Psych Central. Retrieved from

Counseling and Wellness Center. (n.d.). Spheres of influence. University of Florida. Retrieved from

Crethar, H. C. & Ratts, M. J. (2016, February 15). Why social justice is a counseling concern. American Counseling Association. Retrieved from

Cronkleton, E. (2019, April 29). What is breathwork? Healthline. Retrieved from

Daily Stoic. (n.d.). Discourses of Epictetus: Book summary, key lessons and best quotes. Retrieved from

Daily Stoic. (n.d.). What is stoicism? A definition & 9 stoic exercises to get you started. Retrieved from

David, D. (2014, January). The empirical status of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) theory & practice. The Albert Ellis Institute. Retrieved from

David, D., Cotet, C., Matu, S., Mogoase, C., & Stefan, S. (2018, March). 50 years of rational‐emotive and cognitive‐behavioral therapy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved from

Derrington, A. (n.d.). Rational emotive behaviour therapy. Retrieved from

DiGiuseppe, R. (n.d.). Distinctive features of REBT. NuHealth. Retrieved from

Dimock, M. & Wike, R. (2020, November 13). America is exceptional in the nature of its political divide. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from

Dryden, J. (n.d.). Autonomy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from

Dunfey, T. S. (2019, May 29). What is social change and why should we care? Southern New Hampshire University. Retrieved from (n.d.). Limitations. Retrieved from

Elder, K. (2020, May 15). Why you might feel worse after your therapy session. Delaware Psychological Services. Retrieved from

Ellis, A. (2005, October 3). The myth of self-esteem: How rational emotive behavior therapy can change your life forever. Prometheus Books. Retrieved from

EMDR Institute, Inc. (n.d.). What is EMDR? Retrieved from

Felman, A. & Tee-Melegrito, R. A. (2020, April 13). What is mental health? Medical News Today. Retrieved from

Fiste, T. (n.d.). Change and discomfort in psychotherapy. Yourself in Balance. Retrieved from

Free Dictionary, The. (n.d.). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. Retrieved from,+but+words+will+never+hurt+me

Gabbey, A. E. & Raypole, C. (2022, March 3). Aggressive behavior: Understanding aggression and how to treat it. Healthline. Retrieved from

Goal Chaser, The. (n.d.). Epictetus quotes – The power of our own thoughts. Retrieved from

GoodTherapy. (2015, April 7). 20 cognitive distortions and how they affect your life. Retrieved for

GoodTherapy. (2019, August 21). Assigning homework in cognitive behavioral therapy. Retrieved from

GoodTherapy. (2015, December 22). Feminist therapy. Retrieved from

GoodTherapy. (2013, June 26). How to decide what kind of therapy to provide. Retrieved from

GoodTherapy. (n.d.). Types of therapy. Retrieved from

Grande, T. (2019, January 17). Theories of counseling [Official YouTube channel]. YouTube. Retrieved from

Growing Self. (2017, November 17). Embracing growth: Getting comfortable with discomfort. Retrieved from

Grunig, M. (n.d.). Disadvantages. Retrieved from

Guterman, J. (2007, August 26). Albert Ellis: The sickness of self-esteem [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from

Hammond-Beckett, S. (2012). Bridging the worlds of therapy & activism: Intersections, tensions & affinities. The International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work. Retrieved from

Harris, S., Davies, M. F., & Dryden, W. (2006). An experimental test of a core REBT hypothesis: Evidence that irrational beliefs lead to physiological as well as psychological arousal. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, November 18). Big T, little t. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (n.d.). Blog – Categories: Disputation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, August 28). Change ur beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, October 24). Chosen suffering. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, May 17). Circle of concern. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, October 31). Demandingness. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, October 5). Description vs. prescription. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, May 28). Desire and disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, March 15). Disclaimer. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, July 6). Disturbing democracy. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, August 31). Iss-me vs. iss-you. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (n.d.). Hollings Therapy, LLC [Official website]. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2023, January 8). Logic and reason. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, December 2). Low frustration tolerance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, June 23). Meaningful purpose. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, May 19). Mind tricks. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, November 30). More tools for the proverbial toolbox. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, November 7). Personal ownership. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, June 27). Rigid terms of service. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, November 1). Self-disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, October 7). Should, must, and ought. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, May 28). Stoically existential. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, November 9). The ABC model. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, December 23). The A-C connection. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, December 25). The B-C connection. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, November 2). The critical A. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, November 2). The formula. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, December 14). The is-ought problem. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, August 15). The steel man technique. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, November 15). To don a hat. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, July 11). Unconditional acceptance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, November 25). Victimhood. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, September 3). You gon’ die: The existential window. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Johnson, K. (n.d.). Psychology. Retrieved from

Information Philosopher, The. (n.d.). Self-determination. Retrieved from

Joly, V. (2019, February 11). Investigating false claims of evidence-based psychotherapy. Therapy Route. Retrieved from

Karson, M. (2021, July 20). The problem with claims of “lived experience.” Psychology Today. Retrieved from

Kitzinger, C. (1996). Therapy and how it undermines the practice of radical feminism*. Feminist Reprise. Retrieved from

Legg, C. (n.d.). Pragmatism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from

Lieber, A. (2021, May 7). Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT): What is it and does it work? Psycom. Retrieved from

Light, S. (n.d.). Transform your life: Lasting change starts from within. Tiny Buddha. Retrieved from

Living Better Lives Counseling, LLC. (2021, February 25). How to feel your feelings: Allowing yourself to feel fully. Retrieved from

Loggins, B. (2021, September 25). What is infantilization? Verywell Mind. Retrieved from

Lozano, E. B. & Laurent, S. M. (2019, March 7). The effect of admitting fault versus shifting blame on expectations for others to do the same. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved from

Matweychuk, W. J. (2014, January 25). The REBT path. REBT Doctor. Retrieved from

Mayo Clinic. (n.d.). Stress management. Retrieved from

Mental Health America. (n.d.). Mental health treatments. Retrieved from (n.d.). What is mental health? U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Retrieved from

Mental Health Match. (2020, April 23). A glossary of therapy approaches & modalities. Retrieved from

Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Race-baiting. Retrieved from

MyClientsPlus. (n.d.). How to use minimal encouragers as a therapist. Retrieved from

National Alliance on Mental Illness. (2020, April). Types of mental health professionals. Retrieved from

National Alliance on Mental Illness. (n.d.). What does it mean to be high-functioning? Retrieved from

Page, S. (2020, June 11). What is social health? A pillar of wellness workers need now. TotalWellness. Retrieved from

Patterson, E. (2020, April 30). Rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT): How it works & what to expect. Choosing Therapy. Retrieved from

PsychologyToday. (n.d.). Find a rational emotive behavior (REBT) therapist. Retrieved from

PsychologyToday. (n.d.). Find a therapist. Retrieved from

Queens University of Charlotte. (2021, November 22). Qen 101: Hashtag this. Retrieved from

Psychology Wiki. (n.d.). Treatment outcomes. Retrieved from

Rauch, J. (2016, October 5). Why you might feel bad (worse) after therapy. Talkspace. Retrieved from

Raypole, C. (2018, September 14). Rational emotive behavior therapy. Healthline. Retrieved from

REBT Education and Training (n.d.). REBT education and training [Official YouTube channel]. YouTube. Retrieved from

REBT Education and Training. (2021, July 19). REBT session structure, inference chain, disputing irrational beliefs--Lecture 5, grad course, REBT [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from

Rice, H. (n.d.). Fatalism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from

Rief, W. & Glombiewski, J. A. (2017, May 12). The role of expectations in mental disorders and their treatment. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved from

Russell, M. (2013). Helplessness to helpfulness. The Albert Ellis Institute. Retrieved from

Satel, S. (2021, August 13). When therapists become activists. American Enterprise Institute. Retrieved from

School of Computer Science. (2007). Existentialism. McGill University. Retrieved from

Schrader, J. (2011, February 24). The victim identity: The allergic reaction to personal responsibility means a difficult life. Psychology Today. Retrieved from

Scott, E. (2020, June 13). How to improve your quality life. Verywell Mind. Retrieved from

Sidali, D. (2015). Therapist patience & human fallibility. The Albert Ellis Institute. Retrieved from

Simmons, S. (2019, October 3). The psychology of buy in. Get Back to Sport. Retrieved from

SmartRecovery. (n.d.). Core beliefs – 12 irrational ideas. Retrieved from

Space to Thrive, A. (n.d.). Intersectional therapy. Retrieved from

Steven Hicks School of Social Work. (n.d.). Go global. The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2021, October 14). Behavioral health treatments and services. Retrieved from

Sullivan, M. (n.d.). Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from

Sutton, J. (2021, December 24). How to foster clients’ autonomy in counseling or therapy. Positive Psychology. Retrieved from

Sutton, J. (2022, July 2). Socratic questioning in psychology: Examples and techniques. Positive Psychology. Retrieved from

TEDx Talks. (2017, February 2). Extreme ownership [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from

Therapy Toronto. (n.d.). About therapeutic modalities. Retrieved from

Thinking Deeply with Ben. (2020, September 14). Existentialism vs absurdism — Explanations and key differences of each. Retrieved from

Thinking Deeply with Ben. (2021, January 5). Existentialism vs nihilism — Explanations and key differences of each. Retrieved from

Tobias, L. (2015). Time wasted by injustice collecting. The Albert Ellis Institute. Retrieved from

Umberson, D. & Montez, J. K. (2011, August 4). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved from

University of Minnesota. (n.d.). What is spirituality? Retrieved from

VITAL Relational Health. (n.d.). VITAL definition of relational health. Retrieved from (n.d.). Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). Retrieved from

Wheeler, M. & Demsar, V. (2021, September 6). The paradox of virtue signaling. Psychology Today. Retrieved from

Whitbourne, S. K. (2015, September 19). 5 reasons we play the blame game. Psychology Today. Retrieved from

White House, The. (2021, June 25). Executive order on diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in the federal workforce. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Albert Ellis. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Communism. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Dialectic. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Didactic method. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Dodo bird verdict. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Paternalism. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Rational emotive behavior therapy. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Socialism. Retrieved from

Williams, G. (2017, May 31). Forget changing the world. Here’s how to change yourself (designed by a therapist). Retrieved from

116 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page