top of page
  • Writer's pictureDeric Hollings

Appeal to Hypocrisy

Recently, I posted an entry entitled Ad Hominem that related to argumentum ad hominem (also known as a personal attack, abusive fallacy, and against the man). Still, there’s another form of ad hominem fallacy called argumentum ad hominem tu quoque (also known as appeal to hypocrisy).

Per one source, “An appeal to hypocrisy, also known as a tu quoque fallacy, is a rebuttal that responds to one claim with reactive criticism rather than with a response to the claim itself. Example: ‘You don’t have enough experience to be the new leader. ‘Neither do you!”

To understand how this fallacy operates, if may be of use to consider its logical form. According to one source:

Logical Form:

Person 1 is claiming that Y is true, but person 1 is acting as if Y is not true.

Therefore, Y must not be true.

As an example, in 1991, Joe Biden stated during a mandatory minimum sentencing speech:

If you have a piece of crack cocaine, no bigger than this quarter that I’m holding in my hand [demonstrates quarter size]—one quarter of one dollar, we passed a law through the leadership of Senator Thurman and myself and others, a law that says—you’re caught with that, you go to jail for five years. You get no probation. You get nothing other than five years in jail. Judge doesn’t have a choice.

A few years after his speech and associated efforts, Biden’s bill transitioned into The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. Regarding this matter, one source affirms:

[T]he 1994 bill interacted with—and reinforced—an existing and highly problematic piece of legislation: The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, which created huge disparities in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine. Under this bill, a person was sentenced to a five-year minimum sentence for five grams of crack cocaine, but it took 500 grams of powder cocaine to trigger the same sentence. Because crack is a cheaper alternative to powder cocaine, it is more prominent in low-income neighborhoods. These neighborhoods are more likely to be predominately Black and in urban areas that can be over-policed more easily than suburban or rural areas.

Fast-forward, Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden—a white man, has reportedly “acknowledged a decades-long addiction to alcohol and crack cocaine.” Despite Joe Biden’s impassioned advocacy for “nothing other than five years in jail,” Hunter was apparently immune to his dad’s policy.

Given this information, suppose I concluded, “Joe Biden argued strongly against crack cocaine, yet when it came to his white son’s alleged crack use, Joe Biden didn’t push for similar sentencing as he did for nonwhite users of the substance; therefore, crack use is acceptable.”

I would have committed the appeal to hypocrisy fallacy. The fact that Joe Biden neglected to push for equal sentencing when it came to his son isn’t evidence for accepted crack use, only that he is—by his actions—a hypocrite.

To complicate the chosen example herein, consider what one source states of the appeal to hypocrisy fallacy:

An appeal to hypocrisy is a logical fallacy in which one attempts to discredit an opponent’s position by showing that the person making the argument has been unable to act in accordance with the position being argued for. By showing the person to be acting in a hypocritical manner, it is hoped that the audience will no longer take the argument seriously and that the argument will be dismissed. Rather than looking at the validity of the argument itself, the reputation of the person making the argument is looked at instead.

Keep in mind that my professed conclusion was that crack use was acceptable. I didn’t argue that Joe Biden couldn’t possibly be a hypocrite. Therefore, my proposal (acceptable crack use) is inaccurate despite the evidenced fact (Joe Biden is a hypocrite).

When choosing to demonstrate this logical fallacy, I wanted to challenge the reader. It’s important to know that attention to the details of an argument is necessary in order to better understand whether or not you agree with a proposal.

Having intentionally picked a socio-politically-charged topic, I suspect some readers will disturb themselves with irrational beliefs about my claim regarding Joe Biden. If you allow your emotions to cloud your judgment, application of logic and reason may prove unnecessarily challenging for you.

Therefore, keeping a rational rather than emotive disposition may benefit you more in the long run. As such, you may concur that Joe Biden’s hypocritical actions pertaining to his son do not suggest that crack use is acceptable to most people.

Finally, dear reader, try not to be intentionally provocative towards people. It’s dreadful behavior that not everyone appreciates. If you never start acting like I do, you won’t miss the grief you could otherwise cause yourself.

(See what I did there?)

If you’re looking for a provider who works to help you understand how thinking impacts physical, mental, emotional, and behavioral elements of your life—helping you to sharpen your critical thinking skills, I invite you to reach out today by using the contact widget on my website.

As a psychotherapist, I’m pleased to help people with an assortment of issues ranging from anger (hostility, rage, and aggression) to relational issues, adjustment matters, trauma experience, justice involvement, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety and depression, and other mood or personality-related matters.

At Hollings Therapy, LLC, serving all of Texas, I aim to treat clients with dignity and respect while offering a multi-lensed approach to the practice of psychotherapy and life coaching. My mission includes: Prioritizing the cognitive and emotive needs of clients, an overall reduction in client suffering, and supporting sustainable growth for the clients I serve. Rather than simply helping you to feel better, I want to help you get better!

Deric Hollings, LPC, LCSW


C-Span. (n.d.). June 20, 1991 | Clip of Senate session – Biden–crack possession 5 years jail sentence [Video]. National Cable Satellite Corporation. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2023, October 15). Ad hominem. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, March 15). Disclaimer. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2023, October 12). Get better. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (n.d.). Hollings Therapy, LLC [Official website]. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2023, May 18). Irrational beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2023, September 19). Life coaching. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2023, January 8). Logic and reason. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, November 1). Self-disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Hollings, D. (2022, October 7). Should, must, and ought. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from

Kramer, L. (2023, April 10). 15 logical fallacies to know, with definitions and examples. Grammarly. Retrieved from

Levenson, M. (2023, September 14). A timeline of Hunter Biden’s life and legal troubles. The New York Times. Retrieved from

Logically Fallacious. (n.d.). Ad hominem (tu quoque). Retrieved from

Psychology Concepts. (n.d.). Appeal to hypocrisy fallacy or tu quoque.

Ray, R. and Galston, W. A. (2020, August 28). Did the 1994 crime bill cause mass incarceration? Brookings. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Hunter Biden. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Joe Biden. Retrieved from

2 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page