top of page
Writer's pictureDeric Hollings

ABC Model


 

One of the major tools of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) is the ABC model which illustrates how when Activating events (“Actions”) occur and people maintain irrational Beliefs about the events, these unhelpful assumptions – and not the actual occurrences – are what cause unpleasant cognitive, emotive, bodily sensation, and behavioral Consequences.

 

In particular, there are four predominate irrational beliefs which people use: demandingness, awfulizing, low frustration tolerance, and global evaluations. To illustrate these unhelpful personal philosophies about oneself, others, and life, consider the following information:

 

Demandingness –

Generally, this rigid form of prescription is expressed through use of should, must, or ought-type narratives. It also presents in the form of have to, gotta, need to, and other derivative varieties of prescriptive demands.

 

It’s worth noting that not all uses of these terms are unhelpful. For instance, there are productive recommendatory shoulds, empirical shoulds, preferential shoulds, ideal shoulds, moral and ethical shoulds, and legal shoulds which may be quite helpful when used toward oneself.

 

As an example, because I helpfully believe that it’s morally and ethically wrong to unlawfully take the life of another person, as well as being against the law in the first place, I maintain that I shouldn’t commit criminal homicide. This sort of personal demandingness isn’t unhealthy.

 

Alternatively, use of absolutistic shoulds and conditional shoulds is how people often disturb themselves. For instance, inflexibly prescribing that other people absolutely must practice REBT is a recipe for self-disturbance.

 

Awfulizing –

Typically, this type of catastrophizing label is affixed to oneself, others, and life. It presents in the form of unproductively descriptive beliefs which indicate that someone or something is terrible, horrible, or awful.

 

As an example, rather than concluding that it’s merely an unpleasant experience on a day when most things seem not to go your way, you unfavorably believe that a difficult day is an awful undertaking. Unaccommodating perspective shifts like this can lead to unpleasant consequences.

 

Low frustration tolerance –

Usually, this form of unhealthy belief appears through use of statements such as “I can’t stand this,” “this is unbearable,” “I can’t abide that,” and other expressions of intolerance and unacceptance. These narratives unhelpfully convince a person of one’s own perceived inability.

 

Rather than building resilience through use of high frustration tolerance beliefs such as “I got this,” “I can handle it,” or “I don’t know if I’ll succeed, but I’ll try,” an individual illogically and unreasonably (collectively “irrationally”) concludes that failure is inevitable. So, why try?

 

Global evaluations –

Commonly, this self-disturbing assumption occurs when people irrationally and negatively rate themselves, others, and life in a manner which excludes conflicting information. For instance, claiming that members of an entire political party are deplorable.

 

Such unproductive rating doesn’t take into account plausible factors to the contrary, such as the possibility that one’s partisan opponents may genuinely love their country and want to see improvement for all citizens on a national scale. That doesn’t sound totally deplorable, does it?

 

Addressing these major unproductive attitudes, the ABC model incorporates Disputation of unhelpful assumptions in order to explore Effective new beliefs. Noteworthy, Actions and Consequences aren’t subject to Dispute – only irrational Beliefs receive this type of challenge.

 

From a psychological standpoint, people upset themselves using a Belief-Consequence (B-C) connection. Of course, this isn’t to suggest that in the context of the naturalistic or physical world there is no Action-Consequence (A-C) connection.

 

As an example, if someone abruptly cuts you off when driving and a pebble kicked up by the other motorist’s tire strikes your windshield (Action), your windshield may crack (Consequence). From an A-C perspective, pebbles moving at a high velocity can crack glass.

 

Still, if when your windshield is cracked (Action) you unhelpfully Believe, “That shouldn’t have happened to me, and that person is a jerk,” then you’ll likely disturb yourself into an angry disposition (Consequence). Thus, self-disturbance is caused by a B-C connection.

 

When using REBT, I try to help people stop upsetting themselves through use of B-C connections, though I can’t fully resolve their A-C connections. Although it would be nice if as a psychotherapist I could stop all undesirable experiences, I don’t have that sort of power.

 

Nevertheless, I can try to help people empower themselves through use of REBT. Uniquely, if there were a mathematical formula for the ABC model, it would be something like:

Action + Belief = Consequence ÷ Disputation = Effective new belief.

 

Herein, I’ve briefly described how the ABC model works. Of course, depending on the problems people bring to session, use of this helpful tool may take longer to master than what I’ve presented herein.

 

This is where working with a professional REBT practitioner comes in handy. Likely, a person will receive negotiated homework exercises which can strengthen one’s resolve in the routine practice of REBT – which recommendatorily should occur daily.

 

If you’d like to know more about the ABC model, I look forward to hearing from you. Also, by clicking the following image link, you’re welcome to a free ABC model handout:


 

If you’re looking for a provider who works to help you understand how thinking impacts physical, mental, emotional, and behavioral elements of your life—helping you to sharpen your critical thinking skills, I invite you to reach out today by using the contact widget on my website.

 

As a psychotherapist, I’m pleased to help people with an assortment of issues ranging from anger (hostility, rage, and aggression) to relational issues, adjustment matters, trauma experience, justice involvement, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety and depression, and other mood or personality-related matters.

 

At Hollings Therapy, LLC, serving all of Texas, I aim to treat clients with dignity and respect while offering a multi-lensed approach to the practice of psychotherapy and life coaching. My mission includes: Prioritizing the cognitive and emotive needs of clients, an overall reduction in client suffering, and supporting sustainable growth for the clients I serve. Rather than simply helping you to feel better, I want to help you get better!

 

 

Deric Hollings, LPC, LCSW

 

References:

 

Hollings, D. (2024, July 9). Absolutistic should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/absolutistic-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, August 7). Awfulizing. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/awfulizing

Hollings, D. (2024, July 9). Conditional should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/conditional-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, March 19). Consequences. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/consequences

Hollings, D. (2022, October 31). Demandingness. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/demandingness

Hollings, D. (2022, October 5). Description vs. prescription. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/description-vs-prescription

Hollings, D. (2022, March 15). Disclaimer. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/disclaimer

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Empirical should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/empirical-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, September 8). Fair use. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/fair-use

Hollings, D. (2024, April 2). Four major irrational beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/four-major-irrational-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, October 12). Get better. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/get-better

Hollings, D. (2023, September 13). Global evaluations. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/global-evaluations

Hollings, D. (2024, February 24). High frustration tolerance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/high-frustration-tolerance

Hollings, D. (n.d.). Hollings Therapy, LLC [Official website]. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/

Hollings, D. (2024, April 18). Homework. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/homework

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Ideal should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/ideal-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, May 18). Irrational beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/irrational-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2022, November 10). Labeling. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/labeling

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Legal should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/legal-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, September 19). Life coaching. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/life-coaching

Hollings, D. (2023, January 8). Logic and reason. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/logic-and-reason

Hollings, D. (2022, December 2). Low frustration tolerance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/low-frustration-tolerance

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Moral and ethical should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/moral-and-ethical-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, October 2). Morals and ethics. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/morals-and-ethics

Hollings, D. (2024, September 27). My attitude. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/my-attitude

Hollings, D. (2024, April 22). On disputing. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/on-disputing

Hollings, D. (2023, September 3). On feelings. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/on-feelings

Hollings, D. (2024, July 20). Perspective shift. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/perspective-shift

Hollings, D. (2023, March 20). Practice. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/practice

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Preferential should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/preferential-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, May 5). Psychotherapist. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/psychotherapist

Hollings, D. (2022, March 24). Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rational-emotive-behavior-therapy-rebt

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Recommendatory should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/recommendatory-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, May 8). Resilience. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/resilience

Hollings, D. (2024, January 4). Rigid vs. rigorous. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rigid-vs-rigorous

Hollings, D. (2022, November 1). Self-disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/self-disturbance

Hollings, D. (2024, April 21). Sensation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/sensation

Hollings, D. (2022, October 7). Should, must, and ought. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/should-must-and-ought

Hollings, D. (2022, November 9). The ABC model. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-abc-model

Hollings, D. (2022, December 23). The A-C connection. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-a-c-connection

Hollings, D. (2022, December 25). The B-C connection. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-b-c-connection

Hollings, D. (2024, September 17). The E-C connection. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-e-c-connection

Hollings, D. (2022, November 2). The critical A. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-critical-a

Hollings, D. (2022, November 2). The formula. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-formula

Hollings, D. (2023, February 16). Tna. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/tna

Hollings, D. (2024, March 18). Unhealthy vs. healthy negative emotions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unhealthy-vs-healthy-negative-emotions

Hollings, D. (2024, September 25). Unrealistic philosophies. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unrealistic-philosophies

2 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Adages

Commentaires


bottom of page