The Devil Wears Prada 2: Maybe We Should Just Be Not Perfect Together

[DISCLAIMER]

*The Devil Wears Prada 2 (2026) spoilers contained herein.

Photo credit, property of 20th Century Studios, fair use

I never read the novel The Devil Wears Prada (2003)—about a young woman hired as a personal assistant to a powerful fashion magazine editor, a job that becomes challenging as she experiences difficulty trying to keep up with her boss’s schedule and disobliging expectations.

All the same, I watched the comedy-drama film The Devil Wears Prada (2006) when it first aired, as I enjoyed it due to appreciating the acting of Meryl Streep, Stanley Tucci, Anne Hathaway, and Emily Blunt. It doesn’t seem like that was 20 years ago, though it was!

Recently, I re-watched the film in hopeful anticipation for The Devil Wears Prada 2 (2026). Providing a relatively brief synopsis of the sequel, one source states:

Andy [Hathaway] returns to Runway as Miranda [Streep] navigates a new media landscape and Runway’s position within it. They reconnect with another former assistant, Emily [Blunt], who is now the head of a luxury brand that possesses funding which could ensure Runway’s survival.

As I’m not a superfan of the franchise, I maintain no deeply-held beliefs about the sequel. Also, I dislike celebrity worship, care nothing about high fashion, and I’d rather go a month without transportation or the Internet than to go through one day of scenarios depicted in the film.

All things being equal, The Devil Wears Prada 2 was subjectively fine. Still, while watching the film, I thought of a psychoeducational lesson on Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) which I hope will be more meaningful than was Lady Gaga’s performance in the flick was to me.

For context, in one scene of The Devil Wears Prada 2, Andy and Miranda stand before Leonardo da Vinci’s painting The Last Super—representing the scene of the Last Supper of Jesus with the Twelve Apostles, as it is told in the Gospel of John, and the following dialogue unfolds:

Miranda: Do you know much about the Last Super?

Andy: Not as much as I should.

Miranda: Painting this particular scene is nothing new. You can find frescoes and the same subject matter all over Europe. In the other versions, the Man in Charge is usually depicted with a halo. People think that it was di Vinci’s way of saying, “We are human. No one is perfect.” Humans, our wants, glorious and fallible. And inevitably, we deceive and betray one another… let each other down. [sigh] It’s what we’re built to do. Wouldn’t you agree?

Regarding this scene, I think about how REBT uses unconditional acceptance (UA) to relieve self-induced suffering. This is accomplished through use of unconditional self-acceptance (USA), unconditional other-acceptance (UOA), and unconditional life-acceptance (ULA).

With my approach to REBT, I incorporate author Stephen Covey’s concepts regarding the circles of control, influence, and concern, as well as an area of no concern. UA maps onto the circle of control (USA), circle of influence (UOA), and circle of concern and area of no concern (ULA).

The circle of control encompasses only oneself, the circle of influence encapsulates elements which may be subject to one’s sway, the circle of concern engrosses most matters one can imagine, and the area of no concern relates to all content which isn’t yet imagined.

Concerning Jesus, many people believe Him to have been a demigod (a being that is half-divine and half-human, born of a deity and a human). During my days of having identified as a Christian, I believed Jesus was the infallible representation of salvation for all fallible humans.

Similarly, in The Devil Wears Prada 2, Miranda makes a rational (in accordance with both logic and reason) case for human imperfection. She accurately and rationally states, “No one is perfect,” adding that humans often “deceive and betray one another.”

Concerning whether or not this is what we’re “built to do,” as Miranda suggests, is another matter altogether. Such a claim is unfalsifiable (not capable of being proved false), as it speaks to intention (what one intends—to have in mind as a purpose or goal—to do or bring about).

I cannot possibly know what humans are “built to do,” and neither can you. We may opine in this regard, though we don’t actually know. Nevertheless, we can conclude that – irrespective of whether or not Jesus existed, or if He was of perfect nature – you and I are fallible beings.

Acknowledging this truth about reality is a core feature of USA. For instance, I accept that I’m imperfect. Also, I’m not my beliefs or ideas, and nor am I my behavior. If I deceive or betray others, then this is precisely what a flawed individual would do. Yet, I’m not deceit or betrayal.

In similar fashion, given that USA acknowledges one’s own fallibility, UOA recognizes that other human beings are also imperfect. You aren’t the thoughts in your head or the actions you exhibit. Thus, Lady Gaga is merely a flawed person, though she isn’t her imperfect performance.

Likewise, just as I’m a fallible being (USA) and you are, as well (UOA), life itself is understood to be a less than perfect experience (ULA). Whether or not you, I, or the world has been “built to do” things imperfectly is a matter for the area of no concern. In essence, who knows?

Building upon this first part of a psychoeducational lesson on REBT, there’s another scene in The Devil Wears Prada 2 that’s worth addressing in this regard. There’s a scene in which Andy makes a plea for Peter, her romantic interest, to consider a relationship with her by stating:

Listen, umm, we didn’t have a perfect hello, and we certainly didn’t have a perfect goodbye, but maybe that doesn’t mean anything except we’re not perfect. And maybe we should just be not perfect together.

In consideration of UA, you likely realize at this point that Andy and Peter are, have always been, and will continue living as fallible human beings. Now, I invite you to consider another helpful REBT technique that was illustrated in Andy’s persuasive statement to Peter.

REBT uses the ABC model to illustrate that when an undesirable Action occurs and you Believe an unhelpful narrative about the event, it’s your unfavorable assumption, not the occurrence itself, that causes an unpleasant Consequence. This is known as distress or disturbance.

In particular, there are four predominate irrational beliefs which people often use to distress or disturb themselves: global evaluations, low frustration tolerance, awfulizing, and demandingness. When contemplating these unproductive scripts, think of the acronym GLAD.

Addressing how people upset themselves with unhelpful attitudes, the ABC model incorporates Disputation of unproductive philosophies of life in order to explore Effective new beliefs. Whereas rigid beliefs cause self-disturbance, flexible beliefs result in an un-disturbed condition.

Now, when Miranda asked Andy whether or not she knew much about the Last Super, Andy replied, “Not as much as I should.” In this context, “should” represents a flexible form of demandingness. It’s like Andy expressing, “I preferably should know more about it.”

Given that Andy’s flexible preference hasn’t been fulfilled, then she may experience healthy distress in the form of disappointment. This is likely more desirable to most people than unhealthy disturbance that’s caused by absolutistic or conditional demandingness.

Presuming you comprehend this lesson thus far, I now turn to Andy’s flexible preference regarding Peter. Acknowledging their fallibility, Andy states, “Maybe we should just be not perfect together,” representing a flexible and recommendatory form of demandingness.

Essentially, she expresses, “Maybe we recommendatorily should just be not perfect together, because imperfect is genuinely all we can ever be.” Suppose Peter ignores her pleaded recommendation. In this case, Andy’s belief would then cause healthily distressed annoyance.

Who hasn’t been annoyed before? This common experience is quite tolerable! As an example, when watching The Devil Wears Prada 2, I was healthily distressed by my beliefs about Lady Gaga’s performance. She wasn’t annoying, though my beliefs caused me to be annoyed.

Equally, Andy’s flexible belief captured in her plea to Peter would arguably serve her interests and goals more than inflexibly demanding, “We absolutely should just be not perfect together,” or, “If we should be anything other than perfect, then we can’t be together” (conditional).

Such absolutistic and conditional beliefs of the inflexible variety would probably cause unhealthy disturbance in the form of negative and unhealthy anger. Therefore, in view of this ABC model lesson, the scripts people use tend to make a significant difference in outcomes.

Ultimately, The Devil Wears Prada 2 provided me with an opportunity to practice REBT. While I maintain that the film was “fine,” it allowed me to come up with a psychoeducational lesson regarding how people upset themselves when not practicing UA and the ABC model.

Perhaps you will find this lesson useful. Then again, you may regard it as merely “fine.” That’s okay by me. “Maybe we [recommendatorily] should just be not perfect together” in this imperfect world that we share, because tastes may vary; so, what do you say?

If you’re looking for a provider who tries to work to help understand how thinking impacts physical, mental, emotional, and behavioral elements of your life—helping you to sharpen your critical thinking skills, I invite you to reach out today by using the contact widget on my website.

As a psychotherapist, I’m pleased to try to help people with an assortment of issues ranging from anger (hostility, rage, and aggression) to relational issues, adjustment matters, trauma experience, justice involvement, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety and depression, and other mood or personality-related matters.

At Hollings Therapy, LLC, serving all of Texas, I aim to treat clients with dignity and respect while offering a multi-lensed approach to the practice of psychotherapy and life coaching. My mission includes: Prioritizing the cognitive and emotive needs of clients, an overall reduction in client suffering, and supporting sustainable growth for the clients I serve. Rather than simply trying to help you to feel better, I want to try to help you get better!

Deric Hollings, LPC, LCSW

References:

Devil Wears Prada, The. (n.d.). The Devil Wears Prada 2. Fandom. Retrieved from https://devil-wears-prada.fandom.com/wiki/The_Devil_Wears_Prada_2#Synopsis

Hollings, D. (2024, July 9). Absolutistic should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/absolutistic-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, September 13). Acceptance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/acceptance

Hollings, D. (2025, October 19). Adhering to invisible scripts. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/adhering-to-invisible-scripts

Hollings, D. (2025, September 24). Animalistic instinct: Just because it seems right doesn’t mean it is. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/animalistic-instinct-just-because-it-seems-right-doesn-t-mean-it-is

Hollings, D. (2025, September 18). Are you working against your interests and goals? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/are-you-working-against-your-interests-and-goals

Hollings, D. (2024, November 15). Assumptions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/assumptions

Hollings, D. (2024, November 24). Automatic thoughts and beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/automatic-thoughts-and-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, August 7). Awfulizing. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/awfulizing

Hollings, D. (2025, December 2). Being a good person: You cannot perfect the imperfectible. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/being-a-good-person-you-cannot-perfect-the-imperfectible

Hollings, D. (2026, March 3). Blowback and knock-on effects: Subjectivity of beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/blowback-and-knock-on-effects-subjectivity-of-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2025, September 6). Bringing meaning to the words. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/bringing-meaning-to-the-words

Hollings, D. (2022, May 17). Circle of concern. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/circle-of-concern

Hollings, D. (2024, July 11). Concern and no concern. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/concern-and-no-concern

Hollings, D. (2024, July 9). Conditional should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/conditional-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, April 22). Control. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/control

Hollings, D. (2024, October 27). Correlation does not imply causation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/correlation-does-not-imply-causation

Hollings, D. (2022, October 31). Demandingness. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/demandingness

Hollings, D. (2024, October 21). Desire. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/desire

Hollings, D. (2022, March 15). Disclaimer. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/disclaimer

Hollings, D. (2025, March 12). Distress vs. disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/distress-vs-disturbance

Hollings, D. (2023, September 8). Fair use. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/fair-use

Hollings, D. (2024, May 11). Fallible human being. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/fallible-human-being

Hollings, D. (2024, May 17). Feeling better vs. getting better. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/feeling-better-vs-getting-better-1

Hollings, D. (2026, February 13). Five, four, three… beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/five-four-three-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, October 12). Get better. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/get-better

Hollings, D. (2026, March 2). Get out of your own way: Petty annoyances and minor obstacles. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/get-out-of-your-own-way-petty-annoyances-and-minor-obstacles

Hollings, D. (2024, April 13). Goals. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/goals

Hollings, D. (2023, September 13). Global evaluations. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/global-evaluations

Hollings, D. (2024, August 9). Healthy concern. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/healthy-concern

Hollings, D. (n.d.). Hollings Therapy, LLC [Official website]. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/

Hollings, D. (2026, March 16). Hopeful anticipation vs. disturbing expectation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/hopeful-anticipation-vs-disturbing-expectation

Hollings, D. (2024, February 14). Insufferable vs. undesirable. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/insufferable-vs-undesirable

Hollings, D. (2024, January 2). Interests and goals. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/interests-and-goals

Hollings, D. (2024, October 14). Irrational expectation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/irrational-expectation

Hollings, D. (2026, April 3). Kno one: A negative evaluation – People aren’t their behavior. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/kno-one-a-negative-evaluation-people-aren-t-their-behavior

Hollings, D. (2025, October 13). Knowledge, wisdom, understanding. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/knowledge-wisdom-understanding

Hollings, D. (2025, May 18). Learning to understand, attentively and deeply. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/learning-to-understand-attentively-and-deeply

Hollings, D. (2023, September 19). Life coaching. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/life-coaching

Hollings, D. (2023, January 8). Logic and reason. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/logic-and-reason

Hollings, D. (2022, December 2). Low frustration tolerance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/low-frustration-tolerance

Hollings, D. (2022, June 23). Meaningful purpose. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/meaningful-purpose

Hollings, D. (2024, November 6). Media. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/media

Hollings, D. (2024, September 27). My attitude. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/my-attitude

Hollings, D. (2025, August 2). My philosophy. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/my-philosophy

Hollings, D. (2026, April 26). Negative, but healthy anger and aggression. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/negative-but-healthy-anger-and-aggression

Hollings, D. (2024, May 30). Nobody’s perfect. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/nobody-s-perfect

Hollings, D. (2026, April 4). Objective reality. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/objective-reality

Hollings, D. (2023, April 24). On truth. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/on-truth

Hollings, D. (2024, November 18). Opinions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/opinions

Hollings, D. (2025, December 29). Paradoxical intention: Doing the opposite. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/paradoxical-intention-doing-the-opposite

Hollings, D. (2025, April 9). Perception, action, and will. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/perception-action-and-will

Hollings, D. (2025, September 19). Power. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/power

Hollings, D. (2025, April 25). Preferences vs. expectations. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/preferences-vs-expectations

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Preferential should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/preferential-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, January 1). Psychoeducation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/psychoeducation

Hollings, D. (2024, May 5). Psychotherapist. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/psychotherapist

Hollings, D. (2022, March 24). Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rational-emotive-behavior-therapy-rebt

Hollings, D. (2025, August 13). Rational versus irrational thoughts and beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rational-versus-irrational-thoughts-and-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, July 18). REBT flexibility. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rebt-flexibility

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Recommendatory should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/recommendatory-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, February 17). Revisiting the circle of control. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/revisiting-the-circle-of-control

Hollings, D. (2024, January 4). Rigid vs. rigorous. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rigid-vs-rigorous

Hollings, D. (2022, November 1). Self-disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/self-disturbance

Hollings, D. (2026, April 21). Self-upset. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/self-upset

Hollings, D. (2025, October 22). The construct. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-construct

Hollings, D. (2026, April 23). The three traditionally identified components of the mind: Affect, cognition, and conation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/ the-three-traditionally-identified-components-of-the-mind-affect-cognition-and-conation

Hollings, D. (2025, April 15). This cake smells unpleasant. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/this-cake-smells-unpleasant

Hollings, D. (2025, February 28). To try is my goal. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/to-try-is-my-goal

Hollings, D. (2025, April 18). Tolerable FAD. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/tolerable-fad

Hollings, D. (2024, June 14). Tolerance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/tolerance

Hollings, D. (2025, January 9). Traditional ABC model. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/traditional-abc-model

Hollings, D. (2024, October 20). Unconditional acceptance redux. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-acceptance-redux

Hollings, D. (2023, March 11). Unconditional life-acceptance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-life-acceptance

Hollings, D. (2023, February 25). Unconditional other-acceptance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-other-acceptance

Hollings, D. (2023, March 1). Unconditional self-acceptance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-self-acceptance

Hollings, D. (2023, October 22). Unfalsifiability. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unfalsifiability

Hollings, D. (2024, October 26). Unhelpful expectations. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unhelpful-expectations

Hollings, D. (2023, May 3). Want vs. need. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/want-vs-need

Hollings, D. (2026, March 8). You are not your beliefs or ideas. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/you-are-not-your-beliefs-or-ideas

Hollings, D. (2026, March 26). You’ll have suffered twice. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/you-ll-have-suffered-twice

IMP Awards. (n.d.). The Devil Wears Prada 2 (2026) [Image]. Internet Movie Poster Awards. Retrieved from http://www.impawards.com/2026/devil_wears_prada_two_ver7.html

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Anne Hathaway. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Hathaway

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Apostles in the New Testament. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostles_in_the_New_Testament

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Demigod. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demigod

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Emily Blunt. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Blunt

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Gospel of John. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_John

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Jesus. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Lady Gaga. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Gaga

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Last Super. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Supper

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Leonardo da Vinci. retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_da_Vinci

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Meryl Streep. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meryl_Streep

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Stanley Tucci. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Tucci

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Stephen Covey. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Covey

Wikipedia. (n.d.). The Devil Wears Prada 2. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil_Wears_Prada_2

Wikipedia. (n.d.). The Devil Wears Prada (film). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil_Wears_Prada_(film)

Wikipedia. (n.d.). The Devil Wears Prada (novel). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil_Wears_Prada_(novel)

Wikipedia. (n.d.). The Last Supper (Leonardo). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Supper_(Leonardo)