top of page

Objective Reasoning: Truth About the Reality of Suicide

  • Writer: Deric Hollings
    Deric Hollings
  • 19 hours ago
  • 22 min read

 

Personal Ownership

 

I recently listened to an episode of Joe Rogan’s podcast in which he discussed Theo Von’s purported issues with mental, emotional, and behavioral health (collectively “mental health”), as I thought of a psychoeducational lesson on Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT).

 

Before elaborating, it’s worth noting that when practicing REBT I use personal responsibility and accountability (collectively “ownership”). For better understanding, responsibility is defined as the quality or state of being responsible, such as a moral, legal, or mental accountability.

 

Here, “responsible” is defined as liable to be called to account as the primary cause, motive, or agent, and being able to answer for one’s conduct and obligations—something, such as the demands of conscience or custom, that obligates one to a course of action.

 

Also, “accountable” is defined as subject to giving an account—a statement explaining one’s conduct. Accountability is defined as the quality or state of being accountable, especially regarding an obligation or willingness to accept responsibility or to account for one’s actions.

 

When providing psychoeducational lessons on REBT, a psychotherapeutic modality which arguably requires that one preferably should take personal ownership in order to reduce self-distress or self-disturbance, I lean heavily on both responsibility and accountability.

 

This is because I maintain that people have personal agency (a person’s ability to control one’s own reactions to activating events which are beyond one’s own dominion, especially when one’s response is limited by someone or something else). This is a matter of self-empowerment.

 

Rogan Discussing Von and Suicide

 

I’ll address Joe Rogan’s personal ownership in a bit. Now, during the latter part of 2025, there was a video on social media that purportedly depicted Theo Von’s on-stage performance in which he appears to have stated, “I’m having a long month. I’m tryin’ not to take my own life.”

 

On Rogan’s podcast, episode #2478 (4/2/2026) with Von, the latter stated among other things, “All of our fuckin’ money goes to Israel, and they’re usin’ it to fuckin’ genocide people,” to which the former responded, “We gotta get you off those antidepressants, son. You’re losin’ your fuckin’ marbles!”

 

To lose one’s marbles is to become insane (a dated, usually offensive term meaning one exhibiting a severely disordered state of mind), as I observed people on social media criticizing Rogan for ostensibly inferring that Von was crazy (not mentally sound), which is dismissive.

 

In the next section, I’ll address the common misunderstanding about mental health whereby people often confuse thoughts and beliefs which are irrational (not in accordance with both logic and reason) with insanity, craziness, a loss of marbles, etc. For now, I’ll focus on Rogan.

 

On Rogan’s podcast, episode #2499 (4/2/2026) with Marcus King, the latter discussed his objection to how antidepressants are prescribed. The former than envoked Von’s name when stating, “Yeah, Theo Von’s going through the exact same thing.” This was Von’s private matter.

 

As well, Rogan discussed the topic of suicide, as it allegedly concerns Von. This, too, is a particularly sensitive topic — one which was ostensibly shared by Rogan to an entire global audience. Regarding suicide, the American Psychological Association (APA) states:

 

[T]he act of intentionally taking one’s own life. Death by suicide can occur in the context of a major depressive episode, but it may also occur as a result of substance use or other physical or mental disorders.

 

It can manifest independently of any psychiatric disorder, sometimes without warning signs, particularly as a result of stressful circumstances such as prolonged bereavement, bullying, financial difficulties, or declining health.

 

I have no personal knowledge of Von’s history with suicide or attempted suicide. For clarity, the APA states of attempted suicide:

 

[A] deliberate but unsuccessful attempt to take one’s own life. Research has suggested that older men who are of low socioeconomic status and who are single, divorced, or widowed are at an especially high risk for suicide. Many studies have found an association between childhood physical or sexual abuse and a history of death by suicide as well.

 

Additional risk factors include hopelessness, heightened impulsivity, problem-solving deficits, perfectionism, a family history of suicide, and certain mental disorders (i.e., depression, bipolar disorder, substance use disorders, psychotic disorders). Although protective factors are studied far less commonly, one of the most consistently identified is a supportive social network or family.

 

Per The BMJ, “It is absurd to use drugs for depression that increase the risk of suicide and homicide when we know that cognitive behavioural therapy [CBT] can halve the risk of suicide in patients who have been admitted after a suicide attempt […] and when psychotherapy does not increase the risk of murder.”

 

Noteworthy, per a statement from the Albert Ellis Institute, “REBT is the pioneering form of [CBT] developed by Dr. Albert Ellis in 1955.” This claim is contrary to what another source asserts, “In the 1960s, Aaron Beck developed [CBT].” Either way, REBT is a form of CBT.

 

According to the previous citation from The BMJ, this approach to mental health care is more helpful to those who experience suicidal ideation (thoughts about or a preoccupation with killing oneself, often as a symptom of a major depressive episode) than antidepressants.

 

At any rate, on Rogan’s podcast, episode #2501 (4/2/2026) with Marc Andreessen, Rogan addressed his aforementioned comments regarding Von. Specifically, after Andreessen was no longer present, Rogan stated in part:

 

I just, sort of, wanted to, kind of, explain why I have this thing with Theo where I just want him to be okay. And, you know, we did a podcast a while back where we were talking about, um, he started talkin’ about Israel and I was like, ‘I think you’re just losing your mind.’

 

And a lot of people like, ‘You’re covering for Israel.’ And, it wasn’t what I was tryin’ to do. And it is my fault. It’s, it’s clunky, and I was just tryin’ to talk him off the ledge, because I had seen this video [i.e., Von stating, “I’m tryin’ not to take my own life”]. […]

 

I got scared, because, first of all, I love Theo. And second of all, because I’ve known multiple people that have taken their own life, that I was close to, that I didn’t know they were gonna do it until they did it. And when they did it, you feel so fucked and so helpless. You don’t know what you could’ve said or done differently.

 

First, I applaud Rogan’s use of personal ownership concerning what others apparently considered his nonadaptive behavior when criticizing Von’s perspective on Israel and mannerisms on the podcast episode with Von. It isn’t easy to own one’s outcome in this way.

 

Next, Rogan used justification for evoking Von’s alleged matter of suicide and antidepressants. According to Rogan, this was done from a place of rational compassion — which people often refer to as “empathy” — for his friend (i.e., “I just want him [Von] to be okay”).

 

I won’t focus on Von’s view of Israel, as I’ve done so throughout my blog. Rather, it’s worth noting that Rogan used fear (i.e., “I got scared”) as a motive for his evocation of Von, as Rogan has known “multiple people” who’ve completed suicide. This warrants a lesson on REBT.

 

REBT uses the ABC model to illustrate that when an undesirable Action occurs and you Believe an unhelpful narrative about the event, it’s your unfavorable assumption, not the occurrence itself, that causes an unpleasant Consequence. This is known as distress or disturbance.

 

Noteworthy, with virtually any undesirable Action that occurs, it’s your unfavorable Beliefs which cause unpleasant distress or disturbance (Consequence). Given this framing of self-distress and self-disturbance, it’s worth noting that one REBT source states (page 71):

 

REBT conceptualizes [distress] as healthy even though it is intense. Other approaches to therapy have as their goal the reduction of the intensity of negative emotions. They take this position because they do not keenly differentiate between healthy negative emotions (distress) and unhealthy negative emotions (disturbance).

 

Now, REBT keenly distinguishes between healthy distress and unhealthy disturbance. Healthy distress stems from your rational beliefs about a negative activating event [Action], whilst disturbance stems from your irrational beliefs about the same event.

 

Complete elimination of distress is highly unlikely in an impermanent and uncertain world wherein people conceptually suffer, struggle, and battle with, or merely experience hardship. Still, individuals often make matters worse for themselves by disturbing about such instances.

 

In particular, there are four predominate irrational beliefs which people often use to distress or disturb themselves: global evaluations, low frustration tolerance, awfulizing, and demandingness. When contemplating these unproductive scripts, think of the acronym GLAD.

 

Worth noting, the two forms of should, must, and ought demands with which people most often distress or disturb are associated with use of absolutistic and conditional beliefs. Generally speaking, these scripts serve as inflexible commands used toward oneself, others, and life.

 

An absolute must narrative is, “You absolutely must do as I say!” A conditional should narrative is, “Either you should do as I say, or you should be punished!” Noteworthy, in REBT literature, demandingness of this sort is said to function as a primary appraisal mechanism of self-upset.

 

Global evaluations (i.e., self-downing, other-downing, and life-downing), low frustration tolerance (also known as frustration intolerance), and awfulizing (e.g., terrible, horrible, etc.) function as secondary appraisal mechanisms. Together, GLAD will make you sad or mad, etc.

 

While still functioning as prescriptive rather than descriptive, flexible use of recommendatory, preferential, ideal, empirical, moral and ethical, and legal ought beliefs won’t inevitably cause disturbance, as they may align with distress. Rigidity versus flexibility makes a difference.

 

Additionally, from a psychological standpoint, people distress or disturb themselves using a Belief-Consequence (B-C) connection. Of course, this isn’t to suggest that in the context of the naturalistic or physical world there is no Action-Consequence (A-C) connection.

 

From an A-C view, if person X uses an express method for a suicide attempt, such as a firearm (Action), then this individual may die (Consequence). For the sake of argument, suppose that Rogan knows person X. From a B-C view, a completed suicide doesn’t cause Rogan’s fear.

 

Person X competes suicide (Action) and Rogan hypothetically Believes, “I’m worthless for not having stopped the event [G], and I couldn’t stand another friend’s suicide [L], because that’d be terrible [A], so it mustn’t ever happen again [D],” as he then experiences dread (Consequence).

 

Addressing how people upset themselves with unhelpful attitudes, the ABC model incorporates Disputation of unproductive philosophies of life in order to explore Effective new beliefs. Whereas rigid beliefs cause self-disturbance, flexible beliefs result in an un-disturbed condition.

 

It’s worth reiterating that REBT distinguishes between negative and healthy Consequences (e.g., tolerable fear), and negative and unhealthy Consequences (e.g., dread and the evocation of a friend’s personal experience with mental health issues on a globally-reaching podcast).

 

It’s arguably healthy for Rogan to be fearful that Von may die by suicide. However, there’s a case to be made that it’s unhealthy for Rogan to experience dread in this regard. I presume that Rogan assumed personal ownership of the latter outcome, which is why he’s apologized to Von.

 

Aside from the ABC model, REBT uses unconditional acceptance (UA) to relieve self-induced suffering. This is accomplished through use of unconditional self-acceptance (USA), unconditional other-acceptance (UOA), and unconditional life-acceptance (ULA).

 

With my approach to REBT, I incorporate author Stephen Covey’s concepts regarding the circles of control, influence, and concern, as well as an area of no concern. UA maps onto the circle of control (USA), circle of influence (UOA), and circle of concern and area of no concern (ULA).

 

The circle of control encompasses only oneself, the circle of influence encapsulates elements which may be subject to one’s sway, the circle of concern engrosses most matters one can imagine, and the area of no concern relates to all content which isn’t yet imagined.

 

Hypothetically, regarding his circle of control and USA, Rogan could admit that the only thing over which he has actual control regarding the decisions of others who attempt and/or complete suicide is his own reaction to these undesirable circumstances. Thus, he controls his own dread.

 

Theoretically, concerning his circle of influence and UOA, Rogan could recognize that he may be able to influence Von or others not to attempt and/or complete suicide, yet Rogan has limited abilities of persuasion in this regard. If people truly want to kill themselves, then they will.

 

Notionally, relating to his circle of concern and ULA, Rogan could acknowledge that he has exceedingly limited control and influence over most matters in life. Thus, suicide has occurred long before Rogan was born, it currently occurs, and it will continue occurring after Rogan dies.

 

Speculatively, pertaining to the area of no concern, one could argue that a significant portion of Rogan’s podcast is dedicated to this realm (e.g., interdimensional aliens). Still, Rogan could contemplate whether or not focus on unfalsifiability is worth what little time one has in life.

 

Provided you comprehend the lesson on how to transition from negative and unhealthy disturbance (e.g., dread) to negative and healthy distress (e.g., tolerable fear), then I now turn toward a secondary lesson. If you find what I have to say difficult, then you can use REBT.

 

Objective Reasoning: Truth About the Reality of Suicide

 

As it regards this blogpost, objective is defined as having verifiable existence in the external world, independently of any opinion or judgment. Likewise, subjective is defined as based on or influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudices.

 

Similarly, earlier in this post I referenced that “irrational” regards that which is not in accordance with both logic and reason. Conversely, thoughts and beliefs which are rational regard that which is in accord with both logic and reason.

 

Here, “logic” is the interrelation or sequence of facts or events when seen as inevitable or predictable, and “reason” is a statement offered in explanation or justification. For instance, a modus ponens syllogism uses the following logical form: If p, then q; p; therefore, q.

 

For example, I invite you to consider a proposition I expressed earlier. If people truly want to kill themselves (p), then they will (q). People truly want to kill themselves (p). Therefore, they will (q).

 

This proposal adheres to logical form. Furthermore, I maintain that it’s reasonable, because I productively focus on the circles of control, influence, and concern while helpfully practicing USA, UOA, and ULA. Therefore, I maintain that my proposition is rational. It isn’t crazy!

 

However, plausibly many people will disagree with my perspective and suggest that such an outlook is insane. One comprehensible retort may suggest that I’ve used subjective rather than objective reasoning. For context, one source states:

 

Objective reasoning is the process of making decisions or forming conclusions based on observable and measurable evidence. This type of reasoning is free from personal biases, emotions, and subjective interpretations. It relies on facts, data, and logical analysis to reach conclusions that can be independently verified by others.

 

One of the central themes of UA is that each and every person is a fallible human being. We aren’t perfect, nor are we capable of exercising objective reasoning which is free of subjectivity. Even though some may argue otherwise, I maintain that pure objectivity isn’t possible.

 

Succinctly, one source states of objective reasoning, “There’s a method of reasoning that aims to be objective. But there’s no such thing as a metaphysical entity of ‘objective reasoning.’ That is a myth.” Given this perspective, you can disagree with my proposition on suicide, and call it nutty.

 

Because I acknowledge that I’m incapable of using completely objective reasoning, I also argue that there’s no evidence I’ve seen that supports the notion of objective rationality. Thus, you may distressingly or disturbingly propose that there ought to be a method of stopping all suicides.

 

I think that’s bonkers! Still, the difference between what you and I contradictorily propose warrants a perspective on truth about reality. Whereas “truth” is the body of real things, events, and facts, “reality” is something that is neither derivative nor dependent but exists necessarily.

 

I maintain that there is an objective reality that comprises all of existence. As a flawed individual, I’m incapable of perfectly describing its composition, which is what truth is—a description of reality. Yet, subjective reasoning pollutes this process with prescriptions.

 

For instance, I maintain that if people truly want to kill themselves, then they will, so non-suicidal individuals preferably shouldn’t force upon suicidal people moral prescriptions which are based on subjective reasoning (e.g., suicide mustn’t ever happen). Perhaps you disagree.

 

Your disagreement isn’t without some foundation in truth, because — as I’ve outlined herein — “subjective reasoning pollutes” the process of determining truth about reality when “prescriptions” are applied. This is true regarding both of our imperfect perspectives.

 

Concisely, fallible human beings are incapable of faultlessly objective reasoning. Thus, we are also unable to exercise flawlessly objective rational positions. Ergo, we may continually refine what we believe to be true about reality, though there’s no way we can be perfect in this regard.

 

Therefore, concerning my subjective reasoning, I speak truth about the reality of suicide – as I see it. If people truly want to kill themselves, then they will. As far as I view this matter (i.e., subjectivity), this is true regarding you, me, Theo Von, Joe Rogan, and virtually everyone else.

 

Conclusion

 

I recently listened to an episode of Joe Rogan’s podcast in which he discussed Theo Von’s purported issues with mental health. During his discussion, Rogan admitted to fearing for the life of someone who he appears to consider a valued friend.

 

Providing justification for the Consequence of his Beliefs about the Action, as herein I hypothesized what scripts Rogan may’ve used, Rogan wound up apologizing to Von for how he reacted when likely self-disturbing. That required personal ownership, which I applaud!

 

Aside from illustrating the ABC model for how to un-disturb in favor of negative and healthy distress, I also demonstrated how one may use UA in regard to the topic of suicide. This led to elucidation on what constitutes objectivity, subjectivity, truth, and reality.

 

I’ve concluded that fallible human beings are incapable of exercising completely objective reasoning. Using a subjective proposition about how if people truly want to kill themselves, then they will, I’ve admitted that plausibly many people will disagree with my perspective.

 

I consider this difference of subjective views understandable, because I imperfectly describe what I believe to be true about reality. Others are welcome to maintain opposing views, as none of us wields impeccable thoughts or beliefs which are objectively reasonable or rational.

 

Therefore, concerning my outlook on objective reasoning, as it regards truth about the reality of suicide, people may not only disagree, they may unfavorably self-disturb with rigid beliefs about the matter. If who I’ve described regards you, then I helpfully invite you to practice REBT.

 

If you’re looking for a provider who tries to work to help you understand how thinking impacts physical, mental, emotional, and behavioral elements of your life, I invite you to reach out today by using the contact widget on my website.

 

As a psychotherapist, I’m pleased to try to help people with an assortment of issues ranging from anger (hostility, rage, and aggression) to relational issues, adjustment matters, trauma experience, justice involvement, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety and depression, and other mood or personality-related matters.

 

At Hollings Therapy, LLC, serving all of Texas, I aim to treat clients with dignity and respect while offering a multi-lensed approach to the practice of psychotherapy and life coaching. My mission includes: Prioritizing the cognitive and emotive needs of clients, an overall reduction in client suffering, and supporting sustainable growth for the clients I serve. Rather than simply trying to help you to feel better, I want to try to help you get better!

 

 

Deric Hollings, LPC, LCSW


Photo credit, Designed by Magnific, fair use

 

References:

 

AEI. (n.d.). About Albert Ellis, Ph.D. Albert Ellis Institute. Retrieved from https://albertellis.org/about-albert-ellis-phd/

AEI. (n.d.). Rational emotive behavior therapy. Albert Ellis Institute. Retrieved from https://albertellis.org/rebt-cbt-therapy/

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2023, November 15). Attempted suicide. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/attempted-suicide

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Bereavement. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/bereavement

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Bias. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/bias

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Depression. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/depression

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Disorder. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/disorder

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Dread. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/dread

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Metaphysics. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/metaphysics

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Objective. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/objective

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Subjective. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/subjective

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Suicidal ideation. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/suicidal-ideation

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2023, November 15). Suicide. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/suicide

Chand, S. P., Kuckel, D. P., and Huecker, M. R. (2023, May 23). Cognitive behavior therapy. StatPearls. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470241/

David, D. (2014, January). The empirical status of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) theory & practice. Albert Ellis Institute. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=26813393d7370232253cf964c38a4a03d98b0b97

Dryden, W. and Neenan, M. (2006). Rational emotive behaviour therapy: 100 key points and techniques. Routledge. Retrieved from https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/4b0e2552-2a18-4998-b44f-3a993148f7ac/downloads/REBT%202.pdf?ver=1627365797554

Ferencik, J. (2021, July 21). Our intuitions, biases & why objective reasoning is a myth. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/science-and-philosophy/our-intuitions-biases-why-objective-reasonings-is-a-myth-f2dd832e4d82

Gøtzsche, P. C. (2017, September 3). Antidepressants and murder: case not closed. The BMJ. Retrieved from https://www.bmj.com/content/358/bmj.j3697/rr-4

Hollings, D. (2025, March 2). A demanded thing is a necessary one. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/a-demanded-thing-is-a-necessary-one

Hollings, D. (2024, July 9). Absolutistic should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/absolutistic-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, March 7). Accepting what is. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/accepting-what-is

Hollings, D. (2026, February 8). Adaptive and maladaptive emotions and behavior. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/adaptive-and-maladaptive-emotions-and-behavior

Hollings, D. (2025, October 19). Adhering to invisible scripts. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/adhering-to-invisible-scripts

Hollings, D. (2024, August 25). Agreeing with irrationality. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/agreeing-with-irrationality

Hollings, D. (2026, February 14). Anxiety: Stress don’t affect us, that’s just a part of what living is. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/anxiety-stress-don-t-affect-us-that-s-just-a-part-of-what-living-is

Hollings, D. (2025, September 13). Are your actions ruled by reason? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/are-your-actions-ruled-by-reason

Hollings, D. (2024, November 15). Assumptions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/assumptions

Hollings, D. (2024, August 7). Awfulizing. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/awfulizing

Hollings, D. (2022, November 18). Big T, little t. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/big-t-little-t

Hollings, D. (2025, November 17). Bloodbending: A moral and ethical dilemma regarding control. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/bloodbending-a-moral-and-ethical-dilemma-regarding-control

Hollings, D. (2026, March 9). Bloodlust: Homicidal ideation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/bloodlust-homicidal-ideation

Hollings, D. (2025, October 23). Bringing together sound teaching with sound conduct. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/bringing-together-sound-teaching-with-sound-conduct

Hollings, D. (2024, July 15). Bullying. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/bullying

Hollings, D. (2022, May 17). Circle of concern. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/circle-of-concern

Hollings, D. (2024, May 19). Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/cognitive-behavior-therapy-cbt

Hollings, D. (2024, July 11). Concern and no concern. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/concern-and-no-concern

Hollings, D. (2024, July 9). Conditional should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/conditional-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2026, February 12). Consciousness: Reach your soul. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/consciousness-reach-your-soul

Hollings, D. (2023, April 22). Control. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/control

Hollings, D. (2025, October 3). Control and influence: A soft center and coated in a candy shell. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/control-and-influence-a-soft-center-and-coated-in-a-candy-shell

Hollings, D. (2025, September 6). Control what you can. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/control-what-you-can

Hollings, D. (2024, October 27). Correlation does not imply causation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/correlation-does-not-imply-causation

Hollings, D. (2024, September 14). Crazy. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/crazy

Hollings, D. (2023, June 26). Ctrl+alt+del. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/ctrl-alt-del

Hollings, D. (2022, October 31). Demandingness. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/demandingness

Hollings, D. (2025, October 31). Depression and reasoned choice. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/depression-and-reasoned-choice

Hollings, D. (2022, October 5). Description vs. prescription. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/description-vs-prescription

Hollings, D. (2022, March 15). Disclaimer. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/disclaimer

Hollings, D. (2025, March 12). Distress vs. disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/distress-vs-disturbance

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Empirical should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/empirical-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, December 30). Empowerment. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/empowerment

Hollings, D. (2025, December 5). Evaluations and appraisals: Men are gross, trash, and pigs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/evaluations-and-appraisals-men-are-gross-trash-and-pigs

Hollings, D. (2026, April 12). Excuses, explanations, and justifications. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/excuses-explanations-and-justifications

Hollings, D. (2025, December 13). Explanation and justification. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/explanation-and-justification

Hollings, D. (2026, March 17). Facts and inferences. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/facts-and-inferences

Hollings, D. (2023, September 8). Fair use. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/fair-use

Hollings, D. (2024, May 11). Fallible human being. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/fallible-human-being

Hollings, D. (2026, April 17). Fear, take the wheel. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/fear-take-the-wheel

Hollings, D. (2024, May 17). Feeling better vs. getting better. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/feeling-better-vs-getting-better-1

Hollings, D. (2026, February 13). Five, four, three… beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/five-four-three-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, January 27). Genocide. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/genocide

Hollings, D. (2023, October 12). Get better. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/get-better

Hollings, D. (2023, September 13). Global evaluations. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/global-evaluations

Hollings, D. (2024, April 13). Goals. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/goals

Hollings, D. (2024, August 9). Healthy concern. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/healthy-concern

Hollings, D. (n.d.). Hollings Therapy, LLC [Official website]. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Ideal should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/ideal-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, October 21). Impermanence and uncertainty. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/impermanence-and-uncertainty

Hollings, D. (2025, September 21). Impugning motive: Swallowing a toad. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/impugning-motive-swallowing-a-toad

Hollings, D. (2026, April 26). Impulse. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/impulse

Hollings, D. (2024, February 14). Insufferable vs. undesirable. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/insufferable-vs-undesirable

Hollings, D. (2024, September 26). Interpreted reality. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/interpreted-reality

Hollings, D. (2025, April 23). Judgment. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/judgment

Hollings, D. (2026, March 11). Just the facts. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/just-the-facts

Hollings, D. (2025, October 13). Knowledge, wisdom, understanding. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/knowledge-wisdom-understanding

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Legal should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/legal-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, September 19). Life coaching. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/life-coaching

Hollings, D. (2025, January 8). Life-downing. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/life-downing

Hollings, D. (2026, May 17). Listening to reason through argument: Is the rhetoric of whataboutism persuasive? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/listening-to-reason-through-argument-is-the-rhetoric-of-whataboutism-persuasive

Hollings, D. (2023, January 8). Logic and reason. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/logic-and-reason

Hollings, D. (2025, November 8). Logical consequence: Does it consequentially follow? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/logical-consequence-does-it-consequentially-follow

Hollings, D. (2022, December 2). Low frustration tolerance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/low-frustration-tolerance

Hollings, D. (2024, March 4). Mental, emotional, and behavioral health. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/mental-emotional-and-behavioral-health

Hollings, D. (2025, November 16). Mental health, mental illness, and mental disorder. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/mental-health-mental-illness-and-mental-disorder

Hollings, D. (2024, December 17). Mental issues. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/mental-issues

Hollings, D. (2025, April 16). Mentally corrupt decisions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/mentally-corrupt-decisions

Hollings, D. (2025, March 16). Modus ponens. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/modus-ponens

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Moral and ethical should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/moral-and-ethical-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, April 9). Moral arbiter. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/moral-arbiter

Hollings, D. (2024, September 27). My attitude. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/my-attitude

Hollings, D. (2025, August 2). My philosophy. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/my-philosophy

Hollings, D. (2024, May 30). Nobody’s perfect. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/nobody-s-perfect

Hollings, D. (2024, March 1). Not a feeling. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/not-a-feeling

Hollings, D. (2026, April 2). Objective rationality: What is rational to you may not be rational to others. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/objective-rationality-what-is-rational-to-you-may-not-be-rational-to-others

Hollings, D. (2026, April 4). Objective reality. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/objective-reality

Hollings, D. (2022, October 22). On empathy. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/on-empathy

Hollings, D. (2023, September 3). On feelings. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/on-feelings

Hollings, D. (2023, April 24). On truth. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/on-truth

Hollings, D. (2024, November 18). Opinions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/opinions

Hollings, D. (2025, January 7). Other-downing. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/other-downing

Hollings, D. (2026, April 19). Outcome: Victim mentality and playing the victim. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/outcome-victim-mentality-and-playing-the-victim

Hollings, D. (2026, April 26). Pain away: Learned helplessness. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/pain-away-learned-helplessness

Hollings, D. (2024, February 24). Personal agency. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/personal-agency

Hollings, D. (2022, November 7). Personal ownership. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/personal-ownership

Hollings, D. (2025, September 9). Personal responsibility and accountability. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/personal-responsibility-and-accountability

Hollings, D. (2025, October 27). Physiological and psychological fitness. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/physiological-and-psychological-fitness

Hollings, D. (2025, May 3). Predictability of logic. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/predictability-of-logic

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Preferential should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/preferential-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2026, March 18). Prejudice vs. discernment: Bias. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/prejudice-vs-discernment-bias

Hollings, D. (2025, November 13). Problem solving in regard to anger: How to eat an elephant. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/problem-solving-in-regard-to-anger-how-to-eat-an-elephant

Hollings, D. (2024, January 1). Psychoeducation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/psychoeducation

Hollings, D. (2023, September 15). Psychotherapeutic modalities. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/psychotherapeutic-modalities

Hollings, D. (2024, May 5). Psychotherapist. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/psychotherapist

Hollings, D. (2022, March 24). Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rational-emotive-behavior-therapy-rebt

Hollings, D. (2025, August 13). Rational versus irrational thoughts and beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rational-versus-irrational-thoughts-and-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2024, January 1). Rational vs. irrational. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rational-vs-irrational

Hollings, D. (2024, March 14). REBT and emotions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rebt-and-emotions

Hollings, D. (2024, July 18). REBT flexibility. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rebt-flexibility

Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Recommendatory should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/recommendatory-should-beliefs

Hollings, D. (2023, February 17). Revisiting the circle of control. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/revisiting-the-circle-of-control

Hollings, D. (2024, January 4). Rigid vs. rigorous. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rigid-vs-rigorous

Hollings, D. (2022, November 1). Self-disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/self-disturbance

Hollings, D. (2025, January 6). Self-downing. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/self-downing

Hollings, D. (2026, April 21). Self-upset. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/self-upset

Hollings, D. (2022, October 7). Should, must, and ought. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/should-must-and-ought

Hollings, D. (2024, March 24). Smartphone and social media addiction. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/smartphone-and-social-media-addiction

Hollings, D. (2024, September 14). Strategic empathy. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/strategic-empathy

Hollings, D. (2024, February 27). Suffering, struggling, and battling vs. experiencing. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/suffering-struggling-and-battling-vs-experiencing

Hollings, D. (2025, October 27). Suicide and suicide attempts: Jumping out the window. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/suicide-and-suicide-attempts-jumping-out-the-window

Hollings, D. (2025, August 6). Take an inventory of your obligations. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/take-an-inventory-of-your-obligations

Hollings, D. (2022, December 23). The A-C connection. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-a-c-connection

Hollings, D. (2025, December 21). The awful, very bad, horrible, terrible, no good, unacceptable elements of life. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-awful-very-bad-horrible-terrible-no-good-unacceptable-elements-of-life

Hollings, D. (2022, December 25). The B-C connection. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-b-c-connection

Hollings, D. (2022, November 2). The critical A. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-critical-a

Hollings, D. (2025, February 4). The definition of insanity. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-definition-of-insanity

Hollings, D. (2025, January 2). The distinction between law and justice. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-distinction-between-law-and-justice

Hollings, D. (2026, February 21). The preferences versus expectations paradigm: Love is not enough, though virtue is. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-preferences-versus-expectations-paradigm-love-is-not-enough-though-virtue-is

Hollings, D. (2026, May 15). The speed of thoughts and beliefs: Flipping the bird. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-speed-of-thoughts-and-beliefs-flipping-the-bird

Hollings, D. (2026, April 23). The three traditionally identified components of the mind: Affect, cognition, and conation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/ the-three-traditionally-identified-components-of-the-mind-affect-cognition-and-conation

Hollings, D. (2025, April 15). This cake smells unpleasant. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/this-cake-smells-unpleasant

Hollings, D. (2024, February 6). This ride inevitably ends. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/this-ride-inevitably-ends

Hollings, D. (2023, February 16). Tna. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/__tna

Hollings, D. (2025, February 28). To try is my goal. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/to-try-is-my-goal

Hollings, D. (2025, January 9). Traditional ABC model. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/traditional-abc-model

Hollings, D. (2025, April 18). Tolerable FAD. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/tolerable-fad

Hollings, D. (2026, March 14). Trolley problem: Distress or disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/trolley-problem-distress-or-disturbance

Hollings, D. (2024, October 20). Unconditional acceptance redux. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-acceptance-redux

Hollings, D. (2023, March 11). Unconditional life-acceptance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-life-acceptance

Hollings, D. (2023, February 25). Unconditional other-acceptance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-other-acceptance

Hollings, D. (2023, March 1). Unconditional self-acceptance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-self-acceptance

Hollings, D. (2023, October 22). Unfalsifiability. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unfalsifiability

Hollings, D. (2024, March 18). Unhealthy vs. healthy negative emotions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unhealthy-vs-healthy-negative-emotions

Hollings, D. (2024, October 26). Unhelpful expectations. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unhelpful-expectations

Hollings, D. (2025, February 9). Value. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/value

Hollings, D. (2023, May 3). Want vs. need. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/want-vs-need

Hollings, D. (2025, September 28). War crimes: A rational course of action. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/war-crimes-a-rational-course-of-action

Hollings, D. (2026, March 26). You’ll have suffered twice. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/you-ll-have-suffered-twice

IllBeGood3. (2025, October). Theo Von telling audience member he’s battling suicidal thoughts. Is this a bit or something worrisome? Reddit. Retrieved from https://www.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/1nszfk9/theo_von_telling_audience_member_hes_battling/

Metivier, A. (2024, March 5). Objective vs. subjective reasoning: Everything you need to know. The Magnetic Memory Method. Retrieved from https://www.magneticmemorymethod.com/objective-reasoning/

PowerfulJRE. (2026, April 2). Joe Rogan Experience #2478 – Theo Von [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/wRJ2N8qBPs0?si=TadjqCsa5LNotjdr

PowerfulJRE. (2026, May 14). Joe Rogan Experience #2499 - Marcus King [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/0xMBjMlDY9M?si=XGaSI1IlYdZWGCfH

PowerfulJRE. (2026, May 19). Joe Rogan Experience #2501 - Marc Andreessen [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/PHQvb10vKyk?si=s02Bj2fpABs4hmim

Preston, J. (2024, November 5). Objective vs. subjective reasoning: Everything you need to know. Key to Study. Retrieved from https://www.keytostudy.com/objective-vs-subjective-reasoning/

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Aaron Beck. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Beck

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Antidepressant. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antidepressant

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Joe Rogan. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Rogan

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Marc Andreessen. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Marcus King. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_King

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Stephen Covey. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Covey

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Suicide methods. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_methods

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Theo Von. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theo_Von

Comments


© 2024 by Hollings Therapy, LLC 

bottom of page