Between a Cock and a Hard Place: It’s All Men Until It’s No Men
All Men
I occasionally write about my lived experienced pertaining to graduate studies at the University of Texas at Austin School of Social Work (SSW), regarding the University of Texas (UT) at Austin (2012-2014). For example, I stated in Woke: These Bitches Are Crazy!:
I was told that all males (i.e., boys and men) were oppressors, maintained privileges not afforded to females (i.e., girls and women), and that members of my sex (i.e., male) and gender (i.e., man) were responsible and accountable for sexual assault and rape, without having done these acts.
Even though I identified as a feminist at the time, considering myself an ally to others who also supported social justice causes, I eventually realized that the word “all” served as a perverse qualifier to male-specific oppression. Concerning this matter, one source states:
The hashtag #NotAllMen is a feminist Internet meme. A shortening of the phrase “not all men are like that” (sometimes abbreviated NAMALT), it is a satirical parody of arguments used to deflect attention away from men in discussions of sexual assault, the gender pay gap, and other feminist issues.
The NAMALT form of irreverent communication works thusly. Person XX: “All men are answerable and liable for the rape of women!” Person XY: “Not all men are like that!” Person XX: “Oh, sure, ‘not all men are like that,’ though that’s what a rapist would likely say!”
Due to frequent Kafka traps such as this, I de-identified as a feminist. After all, the only acceptable option for a so-called “good ally,” as I was directly prescribed, was to (1) never challenge feminist narratives and (2) remain silent, unless defending feminist narratives.
Personal Ownership
When practicing Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), I use personal responsibility and accountability (collectively “ownership”). For improved understanding, responsibility is defined as the quality or state of being responsible, such as a moral, legal, or mental accountability.
Here, “responsible” is defined as liable to be called to account as the primary cause, motive, or agent, and being able to answer for one’s conduct and obligations—something, such as the demands of conscience or custom, that obligates one to a course of action.
Also, “accountable” is defined as subject to giving an account—a statement explaining one’s conduct. Accountability is defined as the quality or state of being accountable, especially regarding an obligation or willingness to accept responsibility or to account for one’s actions.
When providing psychoeducational lessons on REBT, a psychotherapeutic modality which arguably requires that one preferably should take personal ownership in order to reduce self-distress or self-disturbance, I lean heavily on both responsibility and accountability.
This is because I maintain that people have personal agency (a person’s ability to control one’s own reactions to activating events which are beyond one’s own dominion, especially when one’s response is limited by someone or something else). This is a matter of self-empowerment.
Unhelpfully, many of my SSW radical feminist peers adopted disempowering narratives. Their infantilizing rhetoric largely deprived females of personal agency and ownership, mainly depending on whether or not circumstances favored girls and women. I abandoned such scripts!
Logic and Reason
After rejecting feminist rhetoric, the remainder of my time at the SSW was spent understanding that my presence in the school was like being between a cock and a hard place. In common parlance, a cock is the adult male of the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus): a rooster.
Yet, the vulgar colloquial term cock refers to a penis. Also, the idiomatic expression between a rock and a hard place means being in a significantly difficult situation where one is expected to choose between two equally unpleasant, dangerous, or unacceptable options (i.e., a dilemma).
I could’ve continued championing due process rights while supporting cocks on one hand (i.e., receiving unpleasant pushback for upholding men’s rights) or experience a hard place on the other hand (e.g., conflict with my SSW peers). Thus, I was between a cock and a hard place!
Now, I view many events through the proverbial lens of REBT, as I’ll provide a psychoeducational lesson that involves thinking and believing which is rational (in accordance with both logic and reason), or not (i.e., irrational), as it regards REBT.
Here, “logic” is the interrelation or sequence of facts or events when seen as inevitable or predictable, and “reason” is a statement offered in explanation or justification. For instance, a modus ponens syllogism uses the following logical form: If p, then q; p; therefore, q.
Before I provide an example, it may be useful to know that one source states, “A theory is, in general, any hypothesis or set of ideas about something, formed in any number of ways through any sort of reasoning for any sort of reason.” Colloquially, a “theory” alludes to a mere belief.
If every theory in which I believe possibly could be true or real (p), then every theory in which I believe empirically must be true or real (q). Every theory in which I believe possibly could be true or real (p). Therefore, every theory in which I believe empirically must be true or real (q).
This proposition follows logical form; yet I argue that it isn’t reasonable, because what could be isn’t necessarily what is. Thus, I consider this syllogistic belief as that relating to irrationality. Nevertheless, I have little doubt that at least one person on this planet disagrees with my outlook.
Noteworthy, my worldview is subjective (characteristic of or belonging to reality as perceived rather than as independent of mind). Thus, not everyone agrees with what everybody else deems as rational or not. Irrespective of advocacy for equality, not everyone maintains the same views.
For clarity, the American Psychological Association defines subjective as “taking place or existing only within the mind,” and defines objective as “having verifiable existence in the external world, independently of any opinion or judgment.”
Also, a rational perspective for one person may not be considered rational by members of a group. For example, people dedicating themselves to the practice of science may fervently disagree with referring to a mere belief as a “theory.” I agree! Yet, this is my subjective view.
I comprehend why members of an in-group would support an unreasonable claim (e.g., female SSW students adopting victim mentality, as though all men are a threat to all women). For instance, I stated in Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics:
[M]y female [SSW] colleagues treated men as a monolith—an organized whole that acts as a single unified powerful or influential force.
Their absurdly illogical and unreasonable claim was easy to dismiss. After all, it was so irrational that if a variable other than “men” were substituted, the claim would be quickly disregarded. To understand what I mean, consider the following modus ponens syllogism:
Form – If p, then q; p; therefore, q.
Example – If men rape, then all men rape; men rape; therefore, all men rape.
Imagine using the same illogical premises regarding women:
Example – If women accuse all men of rape, then all women are bat shit crazy; women accuse all men of rape; therefore all women are bat shit crazy.
The absurdity of irrational proposals such as these relies on overgeneralization. As a man, I’m not responsible or accountable for the behavior of other men. Nevertheless, my female peers used motivated reasoning and appeals to emotion to cast aspersions against all males within the university.
For those men who dared to challenge the Kafka trap set for us, even mainstream publications ridiculed the rational “not all men” defense. Still, it isn’t as though I didn’t understand the ludicrous nature of arguments leveled against all men.
Understanding the argument wasn’t a problem for me. Rather, advocating an irrational claim is where I drew the proverbial line between a cock and a hard place. Recently, I’ve seen online reactions to the 2024 Cornell University rape allegations concerning the so-called “Cornell 7.”
Essentially, seven males stand accused of (not convicted of) having sexually assaulted and/or raped a female when attending Cornell University in 2024. Shortly after the alleged incident was reported, as I understand, an investigation was launched and no criminal charges were filed.
Now, I believe that the woman involved has filed a civil suit. As is the case when discussing ongoing criminal or civil matters such as this, I make no claim of personal knowledge of the affair, as it’s not my intention to falsely attribute any malicious behavior to anyone involved.
Rather, I write about methods that I use when practicing REBT in my personal and professional capacity. Thus, I make no declaration of innocence or guilt regarding the Cornell 7 or the associated woman, other than supporting due process rights (i.e., innocent until proven guilty).
Why on Earth Would I Pay Attention to Reddit?
Now, to strengthen my practice of providing care for mental, emotional, and behavioral health (collectively “mental health”), I often peruse Reddit to obtain knowledge, wisdom, and understanding about social trends affecting the field in which I work. “Why?” you may ask.
For better, worse, or otherwise, artificial intelligence (AI) mechanisms reportedly train on the social media platform. Therefore, as many of my current clients use AI which gleans information from Reddit, I prefer to familiarize myself with knowledge stemming from AI social media slop.
Granted, I don’t pet the proverbial animals when visiting a metaphorical zoo, as I don’t use an active Reddit account. Rather, I observe fallible human beings and AI bots interacting with one another, acquire understanding about how Reddit informs AI, and carry on about my business.
It’s All Men Until It’s No Men
When browsing the TikTokCringe subreddit, I came across a thread in which a man stated, presumably regarding the Cornell 7, “Sit down, shut up; it’s time for ‘It’s All Men,’ explained by a man, since you guys clearly have issues listening to the women that try to explain this shit.”
The condescending tone of the Redditor reminded me of my former SSW peers. Specifically, I recalled the hubris plaguing their arguments—person XX says something, person XY disagrees, and then person XX treats the matter as a misunderstanding instead of a rejected argument.
Consequently, the Redditor continued, “So, first and foremost, ‘it’s all men’ comes from the phrase ‘it’s all men until it’s no men.” He then proceeded to illustrate his argument through use of an ink pen and a piece of paper, as he more or less echoed the view of one source that states:
You want us to stop saying “all men”? Then prove us wrong. Not with comments. Not with hashtags. Not with “as a father of daughters” performances.
Prove it in the moment. When your buddy makes a disgusting joke. When your boss says something creepy about a coworker. When some guy at a bar won’t take no for an answer.
Step in. Speak up. Walk away. Make them feel as foul and disgusting as they’re actually being. Let them know—with your voice, your body, your choices—that you don’t belong to that brotherhood.
Do that. Consistently. Publicly. Uncomfortably.
And then maybe—maybe—we’ll start believing you.
Until then? Yeah. It’s all men. Every single one who stays silent.
This is an irrational point of view! You don’t want me to say that all women are cunts? Then, you should, must, or ought to tell every woman who has beliefs and behavior with which I disagree to stop doing as they do. Maybe—maybe—then I won’t call you a cunt, woman!
Although the logic of this argument abides by a formula (e.g., if p, then q; p; therefore, q), it isn’t reasonable. More than that, it establishes a standard with is impossible (incapable of being or of occurring). No outcome exists whereby all men can or will abide by the demands of all women.
Similarly, it’s all men until it’s no men is irrational and impossible, because this example of moral absolutism cannot, nor ever will be able to, exist when men aren’t a monolith. Noteworthy, one Redditor replied on the thread, “It’s not all men but it could be any man.”
With notable exceptions (e.g., a man in a coma, a paraplegic man, etc.), I concur with this cognitive reframe. Virtually any – though rationally, not all – men may rape women, just as nominally any female educator may sexually assault or rape the students within her care.
REBT
What I’ve demonstrated in this blogpost thus far is a denunciation of an “all men” argument regarding sexual assault and rape. My healthy perspective takes a person out of a situation from being between a cock and a hard place. Now, allow me to illustrate how I care for mental health.
REBT uses the ABC model to illustrate that when an undesirable Action occurs and you Believe an unhelpful narrative about the event, it’s your unfavorable assumption, not the occurrence itself, that causes an unpleasant Consequence. This is known as distress or disturbance.
Noteworthy, with virtually any undesirable Action that occurs, it’s your unfavorable Beliefs which cause unpleasant distress or disturbance (Consequence). Given this framing of self-distress and self-disturbance, it’s worth noting that one REBT source states (page 71):
REBT conceptualizes [distress] as healthy even though it is intense. Other approaches to therapy have as their goal the reduction of the intensity of negative emotions. They take this position because they do not keenly differentiate between healthy negative emotions (distress) and unhealthy negative emotions (disturbance).
Now, REBT keenly distinguishes between healthy distress and unhealthy disturbance. Healthy distress stems from your rational beliefs about a negative activating event [Action], whilst disturbance stems from your irrational beliefs about the same event.
Complete elimination of distress is highly unlikely in an impermanent and uncertain world, wherein people conceptually suffer, struggle, and battle with, or merely experience hardship. Still, individuals often make matters worse for themselves by disturbing about such instances.
In particular, there are four predominate irrational beliefs which people often use to distress or disturb themselves: global evaluations, low frustration tolerance, awfulizing, and demandingness. When contemplating these unproductive scripts, think of the acronym GLAD.
Additionally, from a psychological standpoint, people distress or disturb themselves using a Belief-Consequence (B-C) connection. Of course, this isn’t to suggest that in the context of the naturalistic or physical world there is no Action-Consequence (A-C) connection.
From an A-C view, person XX learns of the so-called Cornell 7 (Action) and tells person XY, “It’s all men until it’s no men (Consequence). This irrational claim isn’t what causes person XY’s negative, but unhealthy anger and aggression, because a B-C connection does that!
Person XX asserts an irrational claim (Action), person XY Believes, “She’s worthless [G], and I can’t abide her claim [L], as it’s horrific [A], so I mustn’t be trapped between a cock and a hard place [D],” and he then endures negative, but unhealthy anger and aggression (Consequence).
Addressing how people upset themselves with unhelpful attitudes, the ABC model incorporates Disputation of unproductive philosophies of life in order to explore Effective new beliefs. Whereas rigid beliefs cause self-disturbance, flexible beliefs result in an un-disturbed condition.
Imagine that instead of an unhealthily self-disturbing Belief, person XY used a healthily self-distressing Effective belief by maintaining, “I wish people didn’t view me as a potential sexual-assaulter or rapist, though this wish is as irrational as the claim it’s all men until it’s no men.”
This rational attitude would likely result in negative, though healthy disgust (Consequence), regarding how a significant number of women apparently maintain that many, most, or even all men are ostensibly waiting for the moment in which they can sexually assault or rape women.
Even regarding this perspective, REBT uses unconditional acceptance (UA) to relieve self-induced suffering. This is accomplished through use of unconditional self-acceptance (USA), unconditional other-acceptance (UOA), and unconditional life-acceptance (ULA).
With my approach to REBT, I incorporate author Stephen Covey’s concepts regarding the circles of control, influence, and concern, as well as an area of no concern. UA maps onto the circle of control (USA), circle of influence (UOA), and circle of concern and area of no concern (ULA).
The circle of control encompasses only oneself, the circle of influence encapsulates elements which may be subject to one’s sway, the circle of concern engrosses most matters one can imagine, and the area of no concern relates to all content which isn’t yet imagined.
Regarding person XY’s circle of control and USA, he can admit that he’s merely a flawed individual who can control whether or not he’ll sexually assault or rape someone. This is the case irrespective of whether or not anyone else believes that he maintains this level of control.
Concerning his circle of influence and UOA, person XY can acknowledge that other fallible people can and do believe that he’s simply waiting for the moment to sexually assault or rape another person. These individuals are entitled to their irrational views, even the impossible ones.
Relating to person XY’s circle of concern and ULA, he can recognize that we live in an imperfect world in which sexual assault and rape, as well as impossible perspectives, do exist. Also, he can’t control or influence this fact any more than he can reverse time.
As for person XY’s area of no concern, a hypothetical realm in which all men are a monolith and remain collectively responsible and accountable for all other men, there’s no convincing evidence that such a dimension actually exists. Thus, there’s no point in entertaining this notion.
Conclusion
Perhaps, like me, you’ve paid attention to the allegations regarding the Cornell 7. Do you find that when your views don’t reflect those of other people’s, you’re caught between a cock and a hard place? Maybe you actually maintain that it’s all men until it’s no men.
Regardless of your perspective or experience in regard to the alleged Actions of the so-called Cornell 7, what are the Consequences of your Beliefs? Do you experience healthy indifference, healthy distress, or unhealthy disturbance?
Prior to this blogpost, did you even know of the B-C connection and how it causes your reactions to undesirable events? Favorably, the case of the Cornell 7 isn’t my first run-in with radical feminism or its acolytes. As expressed herein, I, too, used to identify as a feminist.
Still, once I understood the irrationality of feminist rhetoric, I challenged impossible claims such as it’s all men until it’s no men. Now, I focus on controlling my response to displeasing events, as well as attempting to influence others to improve their reactions to such matters.
This begins with personal ownership! Even if society adopts a view that rejects women maintaining personal agency and ownership when the situation suits them, then I acknowledge that I maintain personal responsibility and accountability for my reactions to such narratives.
Hypothetically, if seven men and one woman consume various substances, though the woman is said to have been sexually assaulted and raped due to intoxication – while the men don’t receive the same legal consideration – I control my reaction to this hypocritical view.
Remaining in the realm of hypothetical possibility, not the variety regarding one’s realm of no concern, suppose that a woman voluntarily engaged in a gang bang with seven men. She later cried sexual assault and rape, as the claims suit her interests and goals. I control my reaction.
Continuing with this hypothetical, suppose that a woman has perverse incentives for falsely alleging sexual assault and rape – much like what was advocated when I attended the SSW. What can I control when discovering such circumstances? You guessed it, only my reaction!
Now, I have no way of determining what truly occurred concerning the 2024 Cornell University rape allegations. Controlling my reaction to what I’ve observed online, I’ll no sooner subscribe to a “believe women” standard than I endorse an it’s all men until it’s no men principle.
Given my subjectively rational conclusion in this regard, I anticipate some degree of ad hominem attack (e.g., “You’re a rape apologist [a person who defends, excuses, minimizes, or normalizes sexual violence, or who blames “survivors” for their own assault]!”).
Allow me to preemptively retort with, “Your boos mean nothing, I’ve seen what makes you cheer!” If you cheer the disempowerment of women by denying them personal agency and ownership, then I care little (if at all) if you place me between a cock and a hard place!
If you’re looking for a provider who tries to work to help you understand how thinking impacts physical, mental, emotional, and behavioral elements of your life, I invite you to reach out today by using the contact widget on my website.
As a psychotherapist, I’m pleased to try to help people with an assortment of issues ranging from anger (hostility, rage, and aggression) to relational issues, adjustment matters, trauma experience, justice involvement, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety and depression, and other mood or personality-related matters.
At Hollings Therapy, LLC, serving all of Texas, I aim to treat clients with dignity and respect while offering a multi-lensed approach to the practice of psychotherapy and life coaching. My mission includes: Prioritizing the cognitive and emotive needs of clients, an overall reduction in client suffering, and supporting sustainable growth for the clients I serve. Rather than simply trying to help you to feel better, I want to try to help you get better!
Deric Hollings, LPC, LCSW
Photo credit (edited), photo credit (edited), Designed by Magnific, fair use
References:
APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Objective. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/objective
APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2023, November 15). Privilege. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/privilege
APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Subjective. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/subjective
Dryden, W. and Neenan, M. (2006). Rational emotive behaviour therapy: 100 key points and techniques. Routledge. Retrieved from https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/4b0e2552-2a18-4998-b44f-3a993148f7ac/downloads/REBT%202.pdf?ver=1627365797554
Hollings, D. (2025, March 2). A demanded thing is a necessary one. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/a-demanded-thing-is-a-necessary-one
Hollings, D. (2025, December 1). A diagnosis is a form of hypothesis. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/a-diagnosis-is-a-form-of-hypothesis
Hollings, D. (2026, June 16). A fountain of goodness: Subjective and objective views. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/a-fountain-of-goodness-subjective-and-objective-views
Hollings, D. (2023, March 7). Accepting what is. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/accepting-what-is
Hollings, D. (2023, October 15). Ad hominem. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/ad-hominem
Hollings, D. (2026, February 8). Adaptive and maladaptive emotions and behavior. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/adaptive-and-maladaptive-emotions-and-behavior
Hollings, D. (2025, October 19). Adhering to invisible scripts. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/adhering-to-invisible-scripts
Hollings, D. (2023, October 14). Appeal to emotion. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/appeal-to-emotion
Hollings, D. (2025, September 18). Are you working against your interests and goals? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/are-you-working-against-your-interests-and-goals
Hollings, D. (2025, September 13). Are your actions ruled by reason? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/are-your-actions-ruled-by-reason
Hollings, D. (2025, March 8). As it could be. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/as-it-could-be
Hollings, D. (2024, November 15). Assumptions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/assumptions
Hollings, D. (2026, September 8). Attention: Changing the way you respond to a situation makes a difference. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/attention-changing-the-way-you-respond-to-a-situation-makes-a-difference
Hollings, D. (2024, November 24). Automatic thoughts and beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/automatic-thoughts-and-beliefs
Hollings, D. (2024, August 7). Awfulizing. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/awfulizing
Hollings, D. (2025, November 17). Bloodbending: A moral and ethical dilemma regarding control. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/bloodbending-a-moral-and-ethical-dilemma-regarding-control
Hollings, D. (2026, March 3). Blowback and knock-on effects: Subjectivity of beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/blowback-and-knock-on-effects-subjectivity-of-beliefs
Hollings, D. (2025, October 23). Bringing together sound teaching with sound conduct. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/bringing-together-sound-teaching-with-sound-conduct
Hollings, D. (2022, May 17). Circle of concern. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/circle-of-concern
Hollings, D. (2023, May 15). Cognitive reframing. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/cognitive-reframing
Hollings, D. (2026, July 9). Common sense: Does the proposition use sound judgment? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/common-sense-does-the-proposition-use-sound-judgment
Hollings, D. (2026, July 29). Comprehension: Do you understand the words that are coming out of my mouth. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/comprehension-to-you-understand-the-words-that-are-coming-out-of-my-mouth
Hollings, D. (2024, July 11). Concern and no concern. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/concern-and-no-concern
Hollings, D. (2026, February 19). Conclusions in search of rationale. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/conclusions-in-search-of-rationale
Hollings, D. (2026, February 12). Consciousness: Reach your soul. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/consciousness-reach-your-soul
Hollings, D. (2023, April 22). Control. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/control
Hollings, D. (2025, September 6). Control what you can. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/control-what-you-can
Hollings, D. (2024, October 27). Correlation does not imply causation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/correlation-does-not-imply-causation
Hollings, D. (2026, May 16). Courage: Tell it like it is – or risk the character flaw of cowardice. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/courage-tell-it-like-it-is-or-risk-the-character-flaw-of-cowardice
Hollings, D. (2026, March 28). Dead internet: Motherfucking shit, goddamn asshole. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/dead-internet-motherfucking-shit-goddamn-asshole
Hollings, D. (2022, October 31). Demandingness. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/demandingness
Hollings, D. (2022, October 5). Description vs. prescription. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/description-vs-prescription
Hollings, D. (2025, May 4). Dilemmas and paradoxes. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/dilemmas-and-paradoxes
Hollings, D. (2022, March 15). Disclaimer. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/disclaimer
Hollings, D. (2026, April 17). Disgust. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/disgust
Hollings, D. (2025, March 12). Distress vs. disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/distress-vs-disturbance
Hollings, D. (2026, July 10). Due process: Too much power. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/due-process-too-much-power
Hollings, D. (2025, May 16). Eff the logic. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/eff-the-logic
Hollings, D. (2024, July 10). Empirical should beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/empirical-should-beliefs
Hollings, D. (2024, December 30). Empowerment. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/empowerment
Hollings, D. (2026, May 23). Empowerment vs. disempowerment: Just doing it for the love of the game. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/empowerment-vs-disempowerment-just-doing-it-for-the-love-of-the-game
Hollings, D. (2025, September 8). Entitlement. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/entitlement
Hollings, D. (2025, December 13). Explanation and justification. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/explanation-and-justification
Hollings, D. (2023, September 8). Fair use. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/fair-use
Hollings, D. (2024, May 11). Fallible human being. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/fallible-human-being
Hollings, D. (2024, May 17). Feeling better vs. getting better. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/feeling-better-vs-getting-better-1
Hollings, D. (2023, February 9). Feminism. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/feminism
Hollings, D. (2026, February 13). Five, four, three… beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/five-four-three-beliefs
Hollings, D. (2023, October 12). Get better. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/get-better
Hollings, D. (2023, September 13). Global evaluations. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/global-evaluations
Hollings, D. (2024, April 13). Goals. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/goals
Hollings, D. (2026, September 2). Harm: Negative, though healthy or unhealthy disgust. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/harm-negative-though-healthy-or-unhealthy-disgust
Hollings, D. (2026, September 16). Healthfully negative vs. unhealthfully negative reactions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/healthfully-negative-vs-unhealthfully-negative-reactions
Hollings, D. (2024, August 9). Healthy concern. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/healthy-concern
Hollings, D. (2026, June 6). High and dry: Steering a proverbial ship around unhelpful assumptions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/high-and-dry-steering-a-proverbial-ship-around-unhelpful-assumptions
Hollings, D. (2025, December 31). Hold yourself to a higher standard but not an impossible one. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/hold-yourself-to-a-higher-standard-but-not-an-impossible-one
Hollings, D. (n.d.). Hollings Therapy, LLC [Official website]. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/
Hollings, D. (2026, March 16). Hopeful anticipation vs. disturbing expectation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/hopeful-anticipation-vs-disturbing-expectation
Hollings, D. (2025, September 22). Hubris. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/hubris
Hollings, D. (2026, March 15). Hypocrisy: What is said matters less than what is done. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/hypocrisy-what-is-said-matters-less-than-what-is-done
Hollings, D. (2024, February 20). I have a theory about that. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/i-have-a-theory-about-that
Hollings, D. (2026, May 4). I’ma air out my problemz. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/i-ma-air-out-my-problemz
Hollings, D. (2026, September 27). Imagination: Rational emotive imagery. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/imagination-rational-emotive-imagery
Hollings, D. (2024, October 21). Impermanence and uncertainty. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/impermanence-and-uncertainty
Hollings, D. (2025, September 21). Impugning motive: Swallowing a toad. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/impugning-motive-swallowing-a-toad
Hollings, D. (2024, August 21). In-group and out-group distinction. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/in-group-and-out-group-distinction
Hollings, D. (2025, July 23). Indifference: How much more relaxed would you be? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/indifference-how-much-more-relaxed-would-you-be
Hollings, D. (2022, November 8). Information overload. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/information-overload
Hollings, D. (2024, February 14). Insufferable vs. undesirable. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/insufferable-vs-undesirable
Hollings, D. (2024, October 29). Invalid rhetoric. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/invalid-rhetoric
Hollings, D. (2025, May 18). Irreverent communication: Use of sarcasm, snark, and cynicism. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/irreverent-communication-use-of-sarcasm-snark-and-cynicism
Hollings, D. (2022, August 31). Iss-me vs. iss-you. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/iss-me-vs-iss-you
Hollings, D. (2025, April 23). Judgment. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/judgment
Hollings, D. (2026, March 11). Just the facts. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/just-the-facts
Hollings, D. (2023, June 24). Kafka trap. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/kafka-trap
Hollings, D. (2025, October 13). Knowledge, wisdom, understanding. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/knowledge-wisdom-understanding
Hollings, D. (2025, May 18). Learning to understand, attentively and deeply. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/learning-to-understand-attentively-and-deeply
Hollings, D. (2024, April 14). Lies, damned lies, and statistics. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics
Hollings, D. (2023, September 19). Life coaching. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/life-coaching
Hollings, D. (2026, May 17). Listening to reason through argument: Is the rhetoric of whataboutism persuasive? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/listening-to-reason-through-argument-is-the-rhetoric-of-whataboutism-persuasive
Hollings, D. (2023, September 8). Lived experience. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/lived-experience
Hollings, D. (2023, January 8). Logic and reason. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/logic-and-reason
Hollings, D. (2022, December 2). Low frustration tolerance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/low-frustration-tolerance
Hollings, D. (2024, March 4). Mental, emotional, and behavioral health. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/mental-emotional-and-behavioral-health
Hollings, D. (2025, November 16). Mental health, mental illness, and mental disorder. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/mental-health-mental-illness-and-mental-disorder
Hollings, D. (2025, April 16). Mentally corrupt decisions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/mentally-corrupt-decisions
Hollings, D. (2026, April 28). Metaphor: Life’s a dance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/metaphor-life-s-a-dance
Hollings, D. (2025, March 16). Modus ponens. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/modus-ponens
Hollings, D. (2026, February 16). Moral panic: The irrationality of slogans such as “believe women” and “believe victims”. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/moral-panic-the-irrationality-of-slogans-such-as-believe-women-and-believe-victims
Hollings, D. (2026, September 9). Morals, ethics, law, justice, subjectivity, and objectivity: Can you reserve judgment? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/morals-ethics-law-justice-subjectivity-and-objectivity-can-you-reserve-judgment
Hollings, D. (2024, April 13). Motivated reasoning. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/motivated-reasoning
Hollings, D. (2024, September 27). My attitude. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/my-attitude
Hollings, D. (2025, August 2). My philosophy. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/my-philosophy
Hollings, D. (2026, March 18). Objective morality and moral absolutism. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/objective-morality-and-moral-absolutism
Hollings, D. (2026, April 4). Objective reality. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/objective-reality
Hollings, D. (2026, September 18). On feelings… again. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/on-feelings-again
Hollings, D. (2023, April 24). On truth. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/on-truth
Hollings, D. (2024, November 18). Opinions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/opinions
Hollings, D. (2026, April 19). Outcome: Victim mentality and playing the victim. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/outcome-victim-mentality-and-playing-the-victim
Hollings, D. (2026, July 9). Outlook: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/outlook-the-more-things-change-the-more-they-stay-the-same
Hollings, D. (2026, September 30). Overgeneralization: “I am a good person” – A safe solution. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/overgeneralization-i-am-a-good-person-a-safe-solution
Hollings, D. (2025, April 9). Perception, action, and will. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/perception-action-and-will
Hollings, D. (2024, February 24). Personal agency. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/personal-agency
Hollings, D. (2022, November 7). Personal ownership. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/personal-ownership
Hollings, D. (2025, September 9). Personal responsibility and accountability. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/personal-responsibility-and-accountability
Hollings, D. (2024, July 20). Perspective shift. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/perspective-shift
Hollings, D. (2024, February 10). Perverse incentives. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/perverse-incentives
Hollings, D. (2024, January 31). Perverse qualifiers. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/perverse-qualifiers
Hollings, D. (2026, April 13). PLUR: Addressing sexual assault and rape. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/plur-addressing-sexual-assault-and-rape
Hollings, D. (2026, June 15). Point of view. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/point-of-view
Hollings, D. (2026, May 9). Political violence: Freedom’s got a shotgun. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/political-violence-freedom-s-got-a-shotgun
Hollings, D. (2025, September 19). Power. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/power
Hollings, D. (2025, May 3). Predictability of logic. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/predictability-of-logic
Hollings, D. (2025, April 25). Preferences vs. expectations. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/preferences-vs-expectations
Hollings, D. (2024, May 26). Principles. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/principles
Hollings, D. (2024, January 1). Psychoeducation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/psychoeducation
Hollings, D. (2023, September 15). Psychotherapeutic modalities. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/psychotherapeutic-modalities
Hollings, D. (2024, May 5). Psychotherapist. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/psychotherapist
Hollings, D. (2026, August 22). Rage, rage disorder, and road rage: Negative, but unhealthy anger and aggression. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rage-rage-disorder-and-road-rage-negative-but-unhealthy-anger-and-aggression
Hollings, D. (2022, March 24). Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rational-emotive-behavior-therapy-rebt
Hollings, D. (2025, August 13). Rational versus irrational thoughts and beliefs. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rational-versus-irrational-thoughts-and-beliefs
Hollings, D. (2024, January 1). Rational vs. irrational. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rational-vs-irrational
Hollings, D. (2024, December 5). Reasoning. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/reasoning
Hollings, D. (2024, May 22). Reasoning with the unreasonable. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/reasoning-with-the-unreasonable
Hollings, D. (2024, July 18). REBT flexibility. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rebt-flexibility
Hollings, D. (2023, February 17). Revisiting the circle of control. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/revisiting-the-circle-of-control
Hollings, D. (2024, January 4). Rigid vs. rigorous. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/rigid-vs-rigorous
Hollings, D. (2025, December 31). Sanctum: A focus on irrationality. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/sanctum-a-focus-on-irrationality
Hollings, D. (2026, July 7). Self-distress and distress tolerance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/self-distress-and-distress-tolerance
Hollings, D. (2022, November 1). Self-disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/self-disturbance
Hollings, D. (2026, April 21). Self-upset. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/self-upset
Hollings, D. (2022, October 7). Should, must, and ought. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/should-must-and-ought
Hollings, D. (2026, February 24). Skepticism: I doubt it. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/skepticism-i-doubt-it
Hollings, D. (2024, March 24). Smartphone and social media addiction. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/smartphone-and-social-media-addiction
Hollings, D. (2025, December 24). Some people advocate walking. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/some-people-advocate-walking
Hollings, D. (2026, July 3). Spun by absurdity. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/spun-by-absurdity
Hollings, D. (2026, May 31). Standards and principles. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/standards-and-principles
Hollings, D. (2026, September 17). Startle response and instinct: Inductive and deductive reasoning. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/startle-response-and-instinct-inductive-and-deductive-reasoning
Hollings, D. (2025, December 28). Step up, step back: An infantilizing practice. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/step-up-step-back-an-infantilizing-practice
Hollings, D. (2024, February 27). Suffering, struggling, and battling vs. experiencing. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/suffering-struggling-and-battling-vs-experiencing
Hollings, D. (2023, October 17). Syllogism. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/syllogism
Hollings, D. (2025, August 6). Take an inventory of your obligations. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/take-an-inventory-of-your-obligations
Hollings, D. (2022, December 23). The A-C connection. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-a-c-connection
Hollings, D. (2022, December 25). The B-C connection. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-b-c-connection
Hollings, D. (2026, April 12). The Cartesian crisis: What do I control? What do I influence? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/ the-cartesian-crisis-what-do-i-control-what-do-i-influence
Hollings, D. (2025, October 22). The construct. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-construct
Hollings, D. (2022, November 2). The critical A. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-critical-a
Hollings, D. (2025, January 2). The distinction between law and justice. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-distinction-between-law-and-justice
Hollings, D. (2022, December 14). The is-ought problem. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-is-ought-problem
Hollings, D. (2026, February 21). The preferences versus expectations paradigm: Love is not enough, though virtue is. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-preferences-versus-expectations-paradigm-love-is-not-enough-though-virtue-is
Hollings, D. (2023, August 6). The science. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-science
Hollings, D. (2026, April 23). The three traditionally identified components of the mind: Affect, cognition, and conation. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/the-three-traditionally-identified-components-of-the-mind-affect-cognition-and-conation
Hollings, D. (2025, April 15). This cake smells unpleasant. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/this-cake-smells-unpleasant
Hollings, D. (2024, February 6). This ride inevitably ends. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/this-ride-inevitably-ends
Hollings, D. (2026, June 5). To offend and endure offense: Você tem chulé. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/to-offend-and-endure-offense-você-tem-chulé
Hollings, D. (2025, February 28). To try is my goal. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/to-try-is-my-goal
Hollings, D. (2025, January 9). Traditional ABC model. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/traditional-abc-model
Hollings, D. (2026, March 14). Trolley problem: Distress or disturbance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/trolley-problem-distress-or-disturbance
Hollings, D. (2024, October 20). Unconditional acceptance redux. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-acceptance-redux
Hollings, D. (2023, March 11). Unconditional life-acceptance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-life-acceptance
Hollings, D. (2023, February 25). Unconditional other-acceptance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-other-acceptance
Hollings, D. (2023, March 1). Unconditional self-acceptance. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unconditional-self-acceptance
Hollings, D. (2024, March 18). Unhealthy vs. healthy negative emotions. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unhealthy-vs-healthy-negative-emotions
Hollings, D. (2024, October 26). Unhelpful expectations. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/unhelpful-expectations
Hollings, D. (2022, November 25). Victimhood. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/victimhood
Hollings, D. (2025, September 28). War crimes: A rational course of action. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/war-crimes-a-rational-course-of-action
Hollings, D. (2024, August 20). We all make our choices. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/we-all-make-our-choices
Hollings, D. (2026, May 26). We aren’t all the same. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/we-aren-t-all-the-same
Hollings, D. (2025, June 15). We demand your peace of mind. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/we-demand-your-peace-of-mind
Hollings, D. (2025, March 11). We live in an imperfect world. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/we-live-in-an-imperfect-world
Hollings, D. (2024, July 3). What equality? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/what-equality
Hollings, D. (2023, October 10). When others don’t share your worldview. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/when-others-don-t-share-your-worldview
Hollings, D. (2025, January 10). Who is the one to blame? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/who-is-the-one-to-blame
Hollings, D. (2026, August 19). Wisdom and acting justly are one and the same. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/wisdom-and-acting-justly-are-one-and-the-same
Hollings, D. (2024, April 17). Wishes, dreams, and goals. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/wishes-dreams-and-goals
Hollings, D. (2026, August 21). Woke: These bitches are crazy! Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/woke-these-bitches-are-crazy
Hollings, D. (2025, October 20). Would there be enough evidence to convict you? Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/would-there-be-enough-evidence-to-convict-you
Hollings, D. (2026, March 8). You are not your beliefs or ideas. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/you-are-not-your-beliefs-or-ideas
Hollings, D. (2026, May 8). You cannot vote your way out of oppression or comply your way out of tyranny. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/you-cannot-vote-your-way-out-of-oppression-or-comply-your-way-out-of-tyranny
Hollings, D. (2026, February 14). You have options. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/you-have-options
Hollings, D. (2026, March 26). You’ll have suffered twice. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/you-ll-have-suffered-twice
Hollings, D. (2025, June 12). Your boos mean nothing, I’ve seen what makes you cheer. Hollings Therapy, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.hollingstherapy.com/post/your-boos-mean-nothing-i-ve-seen-what-makes-you-cheer
Mindyour. (2026, October 1). “It’s all men until it’s no men” [Post]. Reddit. Retrieved from https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1wusqyy/its_all_men_until_its_no_men/
Reuters. (2025, October 22). Reddit sues Perplexity for scraping data to train AI system. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/reddit-sues-perplexity-scraping-data-train-ai-system-2025-10-22/
Soepratman. (n.d.). Hand drawn illustration of a rooster vector [Image]. Magnific. Retrieved from https://www.magnific.com/free-vector/hand-drawn-illustration-rooster-vector_427176282.htm#fromView=search&page=1&position=3&uuid=1f464b58-a7a2-4ac0-a30f-7eb6175283a2&track=ais_hybrid&query=rooster
Sugarrhi. (2026, April 30). “It’s all men” until it’s “no men”? Let me explain exactly what we mean. Substack. Retrieved from https://sugarrhi.substack.com/p/its-all-men-until-its-no-men-let
TarickSS. (n.d.). Rock drawing vintage line illustration vector image [Image]. Magnific. Retrieved from https://www.magnific.com/premium-vector/rock-drawing-vintage-line-illustration-vector-image_314609934.htm#fromView=search&page=1&position=26&uuid=6116b232-70cc-4484-a9c3-280d7d5ad4e9&track=ais_hybrid&query=rock+drawing
Wikipedia. (n.d.). 2024 Cornell University rape allegations. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Cornell_University_rape_allegations
Wikipedia. (n.d.). AI slop. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_slop
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Allyship. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allyship
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Artificial intelligence. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Cornell University. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornell_University
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Gang bang. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gang_bang
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Gender pay gap. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_pay_gap
Wikipedia. (n.d.). NotAllMen. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NotAllMen
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Social justice. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Stephen Covey. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Covey
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Steve Hicks School of Social Work. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Hicks_School_of_Social_Work
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Theory. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory
Wikipedia. (n.d.). University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Texas_at_Austin
Zimmerman, J. (2014, April 28). Not all men: A brief history of every dude’s favorite argument. Time. Retrieved from https://time.com/79357/not-all-men-a-brief-history-of-every-dudes-favorite-argument/
